Form 8-K

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

 

 

FORM 8-K

 

 

CURRENT REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): September 3, 2008

 

 

Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

 

 

Massachusetts   000-23599   04-2741391

(State or Other Jurisdiction

of Incorporation)

  (Commission File Number)  

(IRS Employer

Identification No.)

 

199 Riverneck Road, Chelmsford, Massachusetts   01824
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)   (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (978) 256-1300

Not Applicable

(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

 

 

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

 

¨ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

 

¨ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

 

¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

 

¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

 

 

 


Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure.

The management of Mercury Computer Systems, Inc. (“Mercury”) will present an overview of Mercury’s business on September 4, 2008 at the Kaufman Brothers 11th Annual Investor Conference. Attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K (the “Report”) is a copy of the slide presentation to be made by Mercury at the conference.

This information is being furnished pursuant to Item 7.01 of this Report and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section and will not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed by Mercury under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified as being incorporated therein by reference. This Report will not be deemed an admission as to the materiality of any information in this Report that is being disclosed pursuant to Regulation FD.

Please refer to page 2 of Exhibit 99.1 for a discussion of certain forward-looking statements included therein and the risks and uncertainties related thereto, as well as the use of non-GAAP financial measures included therein.

 

Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.

 

(d) Exhibits.

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description

99.1   Presentation materials dated September 4, 2008.


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

Dated: September 3, 2008   MERCURY COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.
  By:  

/s/ Alex A. Van Adzin

    Alex A. Van Adzin
    Vice President, General Counsel,
    and Corporation Secretary


EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description

99.1   Presentation materials dated September 4, 2008.
Presentation Materials
©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
Mark Aslett,
President & Chief Executive Officer
Bob Hult,
SVP & Chief Financial Officer
Kaufman Bros. 11th Annual
Investor Conference
September 4, 2008
Exhibit 99.1


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
2
Forward-Looking Safe Harbor Statement
This presentation contains certain forward-looking statements, as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995,
including those relating to anticipated fiscal 2009 business performance and beyond. You can identify these statements by our use of the
words "may," "will," "should," "plans," "expects," "anticipates," "continue," "estimate," "project," "intend," and similar expressions. These
forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or
anticipated. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, general economic and business conditions, including unforeseen
weakness in the Company's markets, effects of continued geopolitical unrest and regional conflicts, competition, changes in technology and
methods of marketing, delays in completing engineering and manufacturing programs, changes in customer order patterns, changes in
product mix, continued success in technological advances and delivering technological innovations, continued funding of defense programs,
the timing of such funding, changes in the U.S. Government's interpretation of federal procurement rules and regulations, market
acceptance of the Company's products, shortages in components, production delays due to performance quality issues with outsourced
components, the inability to fully realize the expected benefits from acquisitions or delays in realizing such benefits, challenges in integrating
acquired businesses and achieving anticipated synergies, and difficulties in retaining key customers. These risks and uncertainties also
include such additional risk factors as are discussed in the Company's recent filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission,
including its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2007. The Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance
upon any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any
forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made.
Use of Non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) Financial Measures
In addition to reporting financial results in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, the Company provides non-
GAAP financial measures adjusted to exclude certain specified charges, which the Company believes are useful to help investors better
understand its past financial performance and prospects for the future. However, the presentation of non-GAAP financial measures is not
meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for financial information provided in accordance with GAAP. Management believes
these non-GAAP financial measures assist in providing a more complete understanding of the Company's underlying operational results
and trends, and management uses these measures, along with their corresponding GAAP financial measures, to manage the Company's
business, to evaluate its performance compared to prior periods and the marketplace, and to establish operational goals. A reconciliation of
GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures discussed in this presentation is contained in the Company’s Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2008
earnings release, which can be found on our website at www.mc.com/mediacenter/pressreleaseslist.aspx.


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
3
Oil and Gas
Telecommunications
Embedded Computing
Aerospace and Defense
Semi Industry
Life Sciences
Mercury at a Glance
Mercury offers more than 20 years’
experience in designing and delivering
high-performance computing systems and software, for a broad range of
image-
and data-intensive applications, to customers around the world.


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
4
Mercury spans the entire signal processing chain
Modular boards and
integrated systems
Scalable multi core
architectures
Robust software and tools
Open-standard COTS to
custom solutions
Ruggedized systems
Comprehensive services
Visualization software
From RF to Visualization


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
5
Advanced Computing Solutions
ACS focuses on specialized,
high-performance computing
solutions that leverage
Mercury’s capabilities in
sensor computing,
computational acceleration,
and delivery of complex
system-level solutions. 
Example Segments
Aerospace and defense
Semiconductor
Telecommunications
Medical imaging


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
6
Visage Imaging, Inc.
Mercury’s wholly owned
subsidiary focuses on the
development and
distribution of 3D
visualization and PACS
(picture archiving and
communications system)
solutions, and other 3D
software solutions in the
life sciences segment.


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
7
Visualization Sciences Group
VSG focuses on the development
and distribution of software
developer toolkits and 3D
application software for very-
high volume-rendering
applications.
Example Segments
Geosciences –
Oil and Gas
Engineering and manufacturing
Material sciences
Other industrial and
scientific domains


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
8
Why customers choose Mercury
Significant and pioneering investments in specialized FPGA and multi
core computing architectures and software
We maintain ongoing relationships with silicon providers that are unique
Significant multi computing R&D expenditures
The breadth and depth of our product line for specialized computing are unrivalled
Our approach to technical problem-solving in the specialized
computing arena is proven
Assessment of best silicon choices available
Thermal/Power evaluation
System-level architectural design
Application and algorithm performance optimization
Our work on specialized computing-related problems typically results
in significant business value for our customers
Making their products better
Reducing their risk
Lowering their cost
Speeding time to market


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
9
Partial customer and partner list


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
10
Major Company Dynamics (#s GAAP FY08)
Revenue and profitability strength in ACS business
Other businesses eroding operating profits
Notes:
Figures
represent
“un-audited”
GAAP
results
FY08 Operating Profit Total excludes stock-based compensation expense
Includes $7.3M amortization expense, $5.2M restructuring, $18M
goodwill impairment, $3.2M gain for sale of long-lived asset, and
$0.8M inventory write down


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
11
Shift toward defense in ACS business unit
Defense represents economic core of the business
Major ACS Business Dynamics
FY07
FY08
Differentiation and sustainability
largely in Defense
Focus on strengthening Defense
Higher margins in Defense
Force R&D leverage back into model
Selective new commercial pursuits


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
12
Military Electronics Market
COTS $3B of $30B total military electronics market
Increased outsourcing and overall market growth
Move toward collaborative COTS & system integration
Platform upgrades, obsolescence, and new functionality
New platforms with increased electronic content
Defense Electronics Market**
COTS Market*
Sources:  * Venture Development Corp. Embedded COTS in Military,  Aerospace, & Defense Study, 2008     **TEAL Group, Corp,  Military Electronics Briefing with Mercury analysis


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
13
Strategic Direction –
Sell, fix or grow


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
14
Strategic Sequence
Short Term: Improve operations and cash flow
Enhance leadership team to tackle short, medium, long-term strategy
Improve supply chain, manufacturing operations and shipment linearity
Cash conversion cycle
Simplify operations, cross-functional coordination
Medium Term: Strengthen and grow core defense business
Focus and align organization and resources
Accelerate new product development
Reduce time to market
Improve market penetration
Expand opportunities with existing customer base
Long Term: Improve strategic position
Increase software and services
Explore
adjacencies
around
the
Core
Mercury
Federal
Target larger profit pools
Optimize the return from the Company’s portfolio of businesses


Financial Overview
©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
Note: FY08 figures are un-audited


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
16
Founded in 1981
HQ in Chelmsford, MA
Sales, support and R&D
centers in U.S., Europe and
Japan
670 employees worldwide
ending Q408
FY2008 revenues of $210
million
NASDAQ: MRCY
FY08 (Ended June) Revenue Mix
Mercury Overview


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
17
Revenue Growth Follows Investment Cycles
June Fiscal Year End
~ 10% CAGR
FY98 –
FY08E
Revenue ($M)
Represents total Company revenues; VI, VSG and Emerging businesses’
revenue treated as Commercial
All historical figures adjusted for the discontinued operation of Embedded Systems & Professional Services


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
18
FY07 Compared to FY08 (Non-GAAP)
Revenue
217
210
(3%)
Gross Margin
% Revenue
56.4%
60.7%
4.3 pts
Operating
Expenses
139
127
9% Improvement
Operating
Profit
% Revenue
(16)
(7.5%)
1
0.3%
$17M
Improvement
EPS
$(0.37)
$0.15
$0.52
Improvement
Operating   
Cash Flow
$(10)
$14M
$24M Improvement
YTD
Employees
729
670
8% reduction
FY07 Actual
FY08 Actual
FY08 vs FY07
All historical figures adjusted for the discontinued operation of Embedded Systems & Professional Services


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
19
Segment Operating Profit (#s GAAP)
Profitability strength in ACS; non-core businesses eliminating operating profits
Includes $7.3M amortization expense, $5.2M restructuring, $18M
goodwill impairment, $3.2M gain for sale of long-lived asset, and
$0.8M inventory write down
Notes:
Figures represent “un-audited”
GAAP results
FY08 Segment Operating Profit Total excludes stock-based compensation expense


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
20
Strong Balance Sheet
Historically strong
balance sheet
Net cash positive: $41M
FY08 capex
of $5M
$9M positive free cash flow in FY08
Quarter
ended
June
30,
2008
Cash and Equivalents
$166
Total Current Assets
$186
Total Assets
$339
Total Debt
$125
Total Liabilities
$192
Stockholders’
Equity
$147
Notes:
Cash and Equivalents includes $47.2M of auction rate securities
Access to margin loan facility of $23.7M with UBS
Total Debt represents 2% convertible senior notes offering due 2024


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
21
Focus on Working Capital
Supply chain transformation
Operational efficiencies
Manufacturing lead times
Cost of quality
Competitive advantage for
Mercury and customers
Q408: turns of 3.8, $3.9M net
inventory decrease
Customer satisfaction
End-of-quarter shipment skew
DSO dropped from 60 days in
Q308 to 54 days in Q408
DSO target 50 days


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
22
Non-GAAP 
Actual
FY08
Actual
ACS
FY08
Target
Business
Model
Revenue
100%
100%
100%
Gross Margin
61%
59%
58+%
SG&A
36%
27%
Mid 20%
R&D
25%
22%
High
Teens
Income from Operations
0%
10%
15%
Gap to Target Business Model (#s Non-GAAP)
Declining
gross margin
Costs
Reduced


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
23
Fiscal Year 2008 Summary (Non-GAAP)
All quarters’
revenue and EPS exceeded or met the top end of guidance
FY08 book-to-bill 1.04
Note: Q1, Q2, and Q3 historical figures are NOT adjusted for discontinued ops, to reflect appropriate comparison to guidance
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Reported
Guidance
Reported
Guidance
Reported
Guidance
Reported
Guidance
Revenue ($M)
49.2
$    
48.0
$    
52.6
$    
51.0
$    
56.5
$    
$53.0 -
$55.0
55.2
$   
$53.0 -
$56.0
EPS
0.09
$    
(0.08)
$   
0.04
$    
(0.05)
$   
0.04
$    
$(0.04) -
$0.00
0.01
$   
$(0.05) -
$0.01


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
24
Q1 Fiscal Year 2009 Guidance
Impact of equity-based compensation costs related to FAS 123(R) of
approximately $1.6M excluded from non-GAAP
Acquisition-related amortization of approximately $1.4M excluded
from non-GAAP
Restructuring charges of approximately $0.2M excluded from non-
GAAP
Notes:
1)
Figures in millions, except percent and per share data
2)
Company guidance, July 30, 2008 earnings conference call
Quarter Ending September 30, 2008
Revenues ($M)
$47 - $49
      GAAP 
Non-GAAP
Gross Margin
58% - 59%
58% - 59%
EPS
$0.00
$(0.07) - $(0.03)


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
25
Strategic Direction –
Sell, fix or grow


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
26
www.mc.com
NASDAQ: MRCY


Appendix
©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com


©
2008 Mercury Computer Systems, Inc.
www.mc.com
28
GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliation
Q109 Guidance Reconciliation*
* Per Company guidance range, July 30, 2008 earnings conference call
RANGE
Income (Loss) Per Share -
Diluted
Income (Loss) Per Share -
Diluted
GAAP expectation
-
$                                                
-
$                                                
Adjustment to exclude stock-based compensation
0.07
0.07
Adjustment to exclude amortization of acquired intangible assets
0.06
0.06
Adjustment to exclude restructuring
0.01
0.01
Adjustment for tax impact
(0.21)
(0.17)
Non-GAAP expectation
(0.07)
$                                             
(0.03)
$