UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant ý Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨
Check the appropriate box:
¨ Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
ý Definitive Proxy Statement
¨ Definitive Additional Materials
¨ Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
Mercury Systems, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
ý No fee required
¨ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials
¨ Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11
September 8, 2022
Dear Shareholder:
We will hold our Annual Meeting of Shareholders on October 26, 2022, beginning at 10:00 a.m Eastern Time at the Company's headquarters at 50 Minuteman Road, Andover, Massachusetts 01810. We look forward to your attending the meeting either in person or by proxy. The enclosed notice of meeting, proxy statement, and proxy card describe the proposals to be acted upon at the meeting.
Please refer to the enclosed proxy statement for detailed information on each of the proposals. Your vote is important. Please vote by internet, telephone, or mail as soon as possible to ensure your vote is recorded promptly. Please also note that, if you wish to attend the meeting, you must request an admission ticket in advance. To obtain an admission ticket, please follow the instructions on page 1 of the proxy statement.
On behalf of the Board of Directors, we would like to express our appreciation for your continued interest in our company.
| Sincerely yours, | |||||
 | |||||
| Mark Aslett, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director | |||||
MERCURY SYSTEMS, INC.
50 MINUTEMAN ROAD
ANDOVER, MA 01810
(978) 256-1300
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders
To Be Held on October 26, 2022
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of MERCURY SYSTEMS, INC. will be held on October 26, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time at the Company's headquarters at 50 Minuteman Road, Andover, Massachusetts 01810. The meeting is being held for the following purposes:
1. To elect three Class I directors nominated by the Board of Directors, each to serve for a three-year term, and in each case until their successors are duly elected and qualified.
2. To hold an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers (the "say-on-pay" vote).
3. To hold a vote to approve our amended and restated 2018 Stock Incentive Plan.
4. To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2023.
5. To consider and act upon any other business that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.
Proposal Number One relates solely to the election of three Class I directors and does not include any other matters relating to the election of directors, including, without limitation, the election of directors nominated by any Mercury shareholder.
The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on August 24, 2022 as the record date for the meeting. All shareholders of record on that date are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting.
Your vote is important. Please vote by internet, telephone, or mail as soon as possible to ensure your vote is recorded promptly. To attend the meeting, please follow the instructions on page 1 of the proxy statement.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders To Be Held on October 26, 2022: This proxy statement and Annual Report and Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended July 1, 2022 are available at www.edocumentview.com/MRCY.
| By Order of the Board of Directors | |||||
 | |||||
Christopher C. Cambria Secretary | |||||
Andover, Massachusetts
September 8, 2022
i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This executive summary is an overview of information that you will find elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting.
Proposals and Board Recommendations
| No. | Proposal Summary | Board's Voting Recommendations | |||||||||||||||
| 1 | Election of Three Class I Directors | FOR each nominee | |||||||||||||||
| 2 | Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation ("Say-on-Pay") | FOR | |||||||||||||||
| 3 | Amended and Restated 2018 Stock Incentive Plan | FOR | |||||||||||||||
| 4 | Ratification of Appointment of Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal 2023 | FOR | |||||||||||||||
Cautionary Note on Forward-Looking Statements: This proxy statement contains certain forward-looking statements, as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including those relating to the acquisitions described herein and to business performance in fiscal 2023 and beyond, including our projections for revenue, organic growth, bookings growth, and adjusted EBITDA, our expectations regarding the size of our addressable market, and our plans for growth, cost savings, and improvement in profitability and cash flow. You can identify these statements by the use of the words "may," "will," "could," "should," "would," "plans," "expects," "anticipates," "continue," "estimate," "project," "intend," "likely," "forecast," "probable," "potential," and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, continued funding of defense programs, the timing and amounts of such funding, general economic and business conditions, including unforeseen weakness in the Company's markets, effects of epidemics and pandemics such as COVID, effects of any U.S. Federal government shutdown or extended continuing resolution, effects of continued geopolitical unrest and regional conflicts, competition, inflation, changes in technology and methods of marketing, delays in completing engineering and manufacturing programs, changes in customer order patterns, changes in product mix, continued success in technological advances and delivering technological innovations, changes in, or in the U.S. Government's interpretation of, federal export control or procurement rules and regulations, changes in, or in the interpretation or enforcement of environmental rules and regulations, market acceptance of the Company's products, shortages in or delays in receiving components, supply chain volatility for critical components such as semiconductors, production delays or unanticipated expenses due to performance quality issues with outsourced components, inability to fully realize the expected benefits from acquisitions, restructurings and value creation initiatives such as 1MPACT, or delays in realizing such benefits, challenges in integrating acquired businesses and achieving anticipated synergies, effects of shareholder activism, increases in interest rates, changes to industrial security and cyber-security regulations and requirements, changes in tax rates or tax regulations, changes to interest rate swaps or other cash flow hedging arrangements, changes to generally accepted accounting principles, difficulties in retaining key employees and customers, unanticipated costs under fixed-price service and system integration engagements, and various other factors beyond our control. These risks and uncertainties also include such additional risk factors as are discussed in the Company's filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 1, 2022. The Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance upon any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made.
ii
iii
Our named executive officers for our 2022 fiscal year are:
| Name | Position | |||||||
| Mark Aslett | President and Chief Executive Officer | |||||||
| Michael D. Ruppert | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | |||||||
| Thomas Huber | Executive Vice President and Chief Transformation Officer | |||||||
| James M. Stevison | Executive Vice President and Chief Growth Officer | |||||||
| Charles R. Wells, IV | Executive Vice President and President of Microelectronics Division | |||||||
Our executive compensation programs are designed to attract and retain critical executive talent, to motivate behaviors that align with stockholders’ interests and to link payouts with our performance. As described below:
•For fiscal 2022, target pay for our CEO individually, and for all of our named executive officers collectively, falls within a competitive range of 85% to 115% of peer median target pay levels.
•Our pay mix strongly supports the Company's pay-for-performance culture. For fiscal 2022, 87% of the Chief Executive Officer's target pay was in the form of variable pay that is subject to future performance.
•We delivered solid financial performance for fiscal 2022 despite a challenging business environment, resulting in our total shareholder return for fiscal 2022 approximating the 85th percentile of our peers.
•Payouts under our annual- and long-term compensation programs reflected our absolute and relative performance for periods ending in fiscal 2022. Our performance for fiscal 2022 was below our annual incentive plan targets, resulting in payouts at 89.59% of executives' target bonuses. Our overall three-year performance exceeded the 70th percentile of peer company achievements, resulting in performance stock award payouts at 199.9% of target.
•In February 2022, as part of a broad equity retention plan that covered our executives and over 100 additional leaders at our company, we accelerated the grant of long-term incentive awards that would have otherwise been made in August 2022 and granted additional special awards on a one-time basis to promote continuity of leadership, strategy and execution in connection with the reorganization of our operating structure against a backdrop of emerging industry and labor market challenges. These awards are a key element in our ongoing efforts to build on Mercury's strong foundation and drive the next phase of value creation at greater scale. The awards are intended to ensure that leaders across our organization remain focused on advancing our strategy, while at the same time supporting the retention of our key leaders at a critical junction in our transformation. Half of the long-term incentives granted to the named executive officers under this plan were in the form of performance stock awards, which are contingent upon future performance to have any realized value.
•For fiscal 2023, no additional long-term incentives have been, or are expected to be, granted to our named executive officers. In addition, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee") determined to make no changes to the base salaries and target bonuses of our named executive officers. The Committee also adopted a new annual incentive plan design for fiscal 2023 that emphasizes an expanded set of performance measures that we believe to be further aligned with the creation of long-term shareholder value: adjusted EBITDA (weighted 50%), revenue (25%) and adjusted free cash flow (25%). The Committee intends to perform a similar review of our long-term incentive plan design for fiscal 2024, and to then review annual grants of long-term incentives for named executive officers during fiscal 2024 consistent with past practice.
Company Background
Mercury is a technology company that delivers commercial innovation to rapidly transform the global aerospace and defense industry. Our end-to-end processing platform enables a broad range of aerospace and defense programs, optimized for mission success in some of the most challenging and demanding environments. Processing technologies that comprise our platform include signal solutions, display, software applications, networking, storage and secure processing. As a leading manufacturer of essential components, products, modules and subsystems, we sell to defense prime contractors, the U.S. government and original equipment manufacturers (OEM) commercial aerospace companies. Our products and solutions are deployed in more than 300 programs with over 25 different defense prime contractors and commercial aviation customers.
iv
2022 Operating Environment and Performance Achievements
Operating Environment. For fiscal year 2022, we continued to encounter a challenging business environment. Our performance was primarily influenced by the following factors:
•U.S. Government spending for our products and services was adversely affected by an extended continuing resolution, which, while in effect, limited government funding to prior-year levels and delayed awards in respect of new government programs.
•Supply chain volatility — led by long lead times for high-end semiconductors and delayed supplier deliveries or "decommitments" — adversely affected the timing of our revenues and cash management.
•We experienced considerable price inflation in our costs for materials, which adversely affected our business.
•The challenging labor market led to unprecedented attrition and competition for top talent.
Performance Achievements. Despite the challenging industry, labor and economic environment, Mercury delivered solid financial performance for fiscal 2022, highlighted by the following items:
•Our fiscal 2022 revenues increased by 6.9% to $988.2 million, compared to $924.0 million for fiscal 2021. Our fiscal 2022 results included organic revenue of $870.4 million, a decrease of 5% from fiscal 2021.
•Our bookings increased by 21% from $881.2 million in fiscal 2021 to $1,063.1 million in fiscal 2022. Our book-to-bill ratio increased from 0.95x in fiscal 2021 to 1.08x in fiscal 2022.
•Our net income for fiscal 2022 was $11.3 million, compared to $62.0 million for fiscal 2021. Our adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2022 was $200.5 million, remaining relatively flat compared to $201.9 million for fiscal 2021. The adjusted EBITDA results discussed in this paragraph are subject to the adjustments set forth in “Appendix B: Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures to GAAP Measures.”
•We completed the acquisitions of Avalex and Atlanta Micro, which expanded our content and capabilities in both open mission systems and trusted microelectronics.
•Our total shareholder return ("TSR") for fiscal 2022 approximated the 85th percentile of the peer group used to measure our relative performance under long-term incentives awarded in fiscal 2022.
Compensation Philosophy, 2022 Target Pay and 2022 Incentive Plan Payouts
Compensation Philosophy. Our compensation philosophy is designed to promote a pay-for-performance culture. We consider market median compensation levels as our reference point in making executive pay decisions, subject to adjustments based on experience, performance, the other individual factors as described in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Use of Market Data and Competitive Compensation Positioning" beginning on page 45 and as otherwise appropriate. The majority of each executive's target pay is in the form of incentive compensation that is subject to future performance to have any realized value. See the information in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Mix of Pay" on page 45.
2022 Target Pay. The table below details each named executive officer's annual base salary, target annual incentive opportunity ("target bonus") and grant date target value of annual long-term incentive awards (collectively, "target pay") established by the Committee (and in the case of our Chief Executive Officer, ratified by our Board) for fiscal 2022.
v
| Salary | Target Bonus as % of Salary | Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards (1) | Target Pay | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Mark Aslett | 800,060 | 150% | 4,300,000 | 6,300,150 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Michael D. Ruppert | 446,351 | 110% | 1,430,000 | 2,367,337 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Thomas Huber | 425,000 | 100% | 830,000 | 1,680,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| James M. Stevison | 425,000 | 100% | 796,000 | 1,646,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Charles R. Wells, IV | 415,000 | 100% | 830,000 | 1,660,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
(1) The table above is intended to reflect each executive's ordinary compensation for fiscal 2022, and accordingly excludes the value of special long-term incentive ("LTI") awards granted to the named executive officers in February 2022 under an equity retention plan approved by our Board of Directors. In addition, the table excludes the value of "new-hire" awards granted to Messrs. Huber, Stevison and Wells in connection with their commencement of employment during fiscal 2022 because these awards were intended, in part, to restore compensation forfeited with a prior employer as an incentive to join our company. In lieu of these new-hire awards, the table includes the value established by the Committee for each such executive in fiscal 2022 as the basis for future annual LTI awards. For a further discussion of the special awards discussed in this paragraph, see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Equity Retention Plan Awards" beginning on page 51 and "Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Offer Letters with Named Executive Officers" beginning on page 51.
For fiscal 2022, target pay for our CEO individually, and for all of our named executive officers collectively, falls within a competitive range of 85% to 115% of peer median target pay levels. For a further discussion, see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Use of Market Data and Competitive Compensation Positioning" beginning on page 45.
2022 Incentive Plan Payouts. Payouts under our annual incentive plan and our long-term incentive plan performance awards are subject to the achievement of pre-established targets.
With respect to our annual incentive plan, our financial performance achievements for fiscal 2022 were above threshold requirements but below our plan targets, which are based on adjusted EBITDA. Accordingly, aggregate plan payouts to our named executive officers for fiscal 2022 represented 89.59% of their respective target bonuses. For a further discussion, see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of 2022 Target Pay – Annual Incentives" beginning on page 48.
For our long-term performance awards whose performance periods end with fiscal 2022, our performance relative to our peers approximated the 57th percentile for adjusted EBITDA margin and the 86th percentile for revenue growth, resulting in performance stock award payouts at 199.9% of target. For a further discussion, see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Payout of Performance Stock Awards for the 2020-2022 Award Cycle" on page 52.
Special LTI Awards Granted Under Equity Retention Plan
On February 7, 2022, our Board of Directors approved an equity retention plan (the "ERP") for our executives and over 100 additional leaders whose continuing efforts were determined to be critical to our success, including our named executive officers. The Board approved the ERP to promote continuity of leadership, strategy and execution in connection with the reorganization of our operating structure. The ERP is a key element in our ongoing efforts to build on Mercury's strong foundation and drive the next phase of value creation at greater scale. The ERP is intended to ensure that leaders across our organization remain focused on advancing our strategy, while at the same time supporting the retention of our key leaders at a critical junction in our transformation.
Under the ERP, all participants, including our named executive officers, were granted their annual equity awards for fiscal 2023 on February 15, 2022, in lieu of the grants that they would have otherwise received in August 2022. Additional one-time awards were granted under the ERP to support retention and further motivate achievement of our long-term, strategic goals in light of the macroeconomic conditions underlying the adoption of the ERP. The value of these additional retention grants varies among different ERP participants, and ranges from 1x to 2x of each participant's annual long-term incentive compensation. For a further discussion, see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Equity Retention Plan Awards" beginning on page 51.
Consistent with our annual long-term incentive award mix, half of the long-term incentives granted to the named executive officers were in the form of performance stock awards, which are contingent upon future performance to have any realized value, and half were granted in the form of restricted stock awards. No additional long-term incentive awards will be issued to the named executive officers in fiscal 2023.
vi
2023 Target Pay
For fiscal 2023, the Committee determined to make no changes to the base salaries and target bonuses of our named executive officers, nor did it grant them any long-term incentives beyond those previously granted for fiscal 2023 as part of the ERP. To further align our annual incentive program with our long-term growth strategy, the Committee adopted a new annual incentive plan design for fiscal 2023 that emphasizes an expanded set of performance measures tied to the creation of long-term shareholder value: adjusted EBITDA (weighted 50%), revenue (25%) and adjusted free cash flow (25%). The Committee intends to perform a similar review of our long-term incentive plan design for fiscal 2024, and to then review annual grants of long-term incentives for named executive officers during fiscal 2024 consistent with past practice.
vii
Our Board of Directors
The following table provides summary information about our Directors as of the date of this proxy statement.
| Committee Memberships | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Director Since | Primary Occupation | Independent | AC | HC | NGC | GRC | M&A | ||||||||||||||||||
Mark Aslett Class II Director Term Ending in 2023 | 2007 | President and CEO Mercury Systems | No | M | ||||||||||||||||||||||
William L. Ballhaus Class I Director Nominated for a Term Ending in 2025 | 2022 | Former CEO Blackboard Inc. and SRA International Inc. | Yes | M | M | M | ||||||||||||||||||||
James K. Bass Class I Director Term Ending in 2022 | 2010 | Former President and CEO Piper Aircraft | Yes | M, F | M | |||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando P. Carvalho Class III Director Term Ending in 2024 | 2020 | Former Executive Vice President Aeronautics, Lockheed Martin | Yes | M | M | M | ||||||||||||||||||||
Michael A. Daniels Class I Director Term Ending in 2022 | 2010 | Former Chairman and CEO Mobile 365 and Network Solutions | Yes | M | M | M | C | |||||||||||||||||||
Lisa S. Disbrow Class I Director Nominated for a Term Ending in 2025 | 2017 | Under Secretary of the U.S. Air Force (Retired) | Yes | M, F | M | C | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mary Louise Krakauer Class II Director Term Ending in 2023 | 2017 | Former Executive Dell and EMC | Yes | C | M | |||||||||||||||||||||
Howard L. Lance Class I Director Nominated for a Term Ending in 2025 | 2022 | Former President and CEO Maxar Technologies Inc. and Harris Corporation | Yes | M | M | M | M | |||||||||||||||||||
Barry R. Nearhos Class III Director Term Ending in 2024 | 2018 | Former Managing Partner PricewaterhouseCoopers | Yes | C,F | M | M | ||||||||||||||||||||
William K. O'Brien Chairman of the Board Class II Director Term Ending in 2023 | 2008 | Former Executive Chairman Enterasys Networks | Yes | M, F | C | M | ||||||||||||||||||||
Debora A. Plunkett Class III Director Term Ending in 2024 | 2021 | Federal Senior Executive National Security Agency (Retired) | Yes | M | M | M | ||||||||||||||||||||
| AC = Audit Committee | GRC = Government Relations Committee | M = Member | ||||||||||||
| HC = Human Capital and Compensation Committee | M&A = M&A and Finance Committee | C = Committee Chair | ||||||||||||
| NGC = Nominating and Governance Committee | F = Financial Expert | |||||||||||||
viii
We are proposing that William L. Ballhaus, Lisa S. Disbrow, and Howard L. Lance, three continuing Class I directors, be elected to serve terms of three years, and in each case until their successors are duly elected and qualified or until they sooner die, resign, or are removed. Ms. Disbrow was most recently elected as a Class I director at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Messrs. Ballhaus and Lance were appointed to the Board in June 2022 as part of settlements with JANA Partners and Starboard Value executed in June 2022. James K. Bass and Michael A. Daniels, Class I directors, informed the Board of Directors that they will retire from service on the Board at the end of their current terms effective at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. We thank Messrs. Bass and Daniels for their service on the Board since 2010.
Per the settlements with JANA Partners and Starboard Value, Messrs. Ballhaus and Lance have each been appointed to the Nominating and Governance Committee and the M&A and Finance Committee and Mr. Lance has been appointed to the Human Capital and Compensation Committee.
Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance Highlights
Governance
Our focus on good corporate governance stems from our belief that a strong governance framework creates long-term value for our shareholders, strengthens Board and management accountability, and builds trust in us and our brand. Our governance framework includes the following highlights:
| Board and Governance Information (1) | Board and Governance Information (1) | ||||||||||
| Size of the Board of Directors | 9 | Board Meetings Held During Fiscal 2022 | 16 | ||||||||
| Number/ % of Independent Directors | 8/ 89% | Poison Pill | (3) | ||||||||
| Average Age of Independent Directors | 64 | Proxy Access | No | ||||||||
| Average Independent Director Tenure | 4 years | Code of Business Conduct and Ethics | Yes | ||||||||
| Women Board Members | 33% | Stock Ownership Guidelines: Directors & Executives | Yes | ||||||||
| Board Committees Chaired by Women | 40% | Board Refreshment: New Directors Over Past 5 Years | 7 | ||||||||
| Racial/ Ethnically Diverse Board Members | 11% | Board Policy to Reflect Diversity (Gender & Race) | Yes | ||||||||
| Classified Board of Directors | Yes | Anti-Hedging and Pledging Policies | Yes | ||||||||
| Majority Voting in Director Elections | Yes | Compensation Clawback Policy | Yes | ||||||||
| Plurality Voting in Contested Director Elections | Yes | Separate Chairman and CEO | Yes | ||||||||
| Annual Board and Committee Self-Assessments | Yes | Ongoing Shareholder Outreach and Engagement | Yes | ||||||||
| Annual Director Peer Assessments | Yes | Capital Structure with One Vote per Common Share | Yes | ||||||||
| Limited Membership on Other Public Co Boards | Yes | Succession Planning Process for Senior Management | Yes | ||||||||
| Board Committees are 100% Independent Directors | Yes (2) | Regular Executive Sessions without Management | Yes | ||||||||
(1) Reflects the retirements of Messrs. James K. Bass and Michael A. Daniels effective upon the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
(2) Each of the Audit Committee, Human Capital and Compensation Committee, Nominating and Governance Committee, and M&A and Finance Committee is comprised of 100% independent directors. Our CEO is a member of the Government Relations Committee as we believe his experience with our customers and markets adds value to this Committee.
(3) The limited duration shareholders rights agreement that the Board adopted in December 2021 expires effective upon the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Our Board of Directors and executives understand and embrace the importance to all of our primary stakeholders of environmental, social, and governance ("ESG") measurement and reporting. For a number of years, we have been focused on the aspects of ESG we believe have the greatest impact on our business, our stakeholders, and value creation. As it relates to the environment and sustainability, our initial priorities include: talent management and culture; responsible sourcing and operational excellence; cyber security; and environmental stewardship. We have also focused on addressing a number of key governance principles that are generally considered best practices. Of our areas of focus, we are more focused on developing talent management and culture and cyber security because we believe these have the greatest potential to create - and the highest risk to destroy - value for Mercury and our shareholders. We continue to invest in our efforts, results, and reporting accountability, and endeavor to add both to what we do and how we report these efforts over time.
Our executive leadership team oversees and implements our environmental initiatives with a view towards demonstrating our commitment to good corporate citizenship and responsible business practices. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors reviews our ESG practices with a view toward how our efforts help attract,
ix
develop, and retain employee talent, including our culture and values as well as how we demonstrate our commitment to good corporate citizenship. The Nominating and Governance Committee of our Board of Directors is responsible for reviewing and overseeing Mercury's environmental impact and initiatives.
Talent Management
For talent management and culture, we strive to invest in the professional development of our team members, hiring and retaining a diverse workforce. We are focused on ongoing employee training in critical compliance areas and on business ethics, export rules, and our culture of integrity. We adhere to high ethical and security standards and operating with integrity is a foundation of our culture and values. We disclose in the Environmental, Social, and Governance section of our website gender, racial, and ethnicity data, our voluntary and involuntary termination rates, and our OSHA injury rates.
Organizational efficiency and scalability are a major theme of 1MPACT, our value creation program, and in fiscal 2022 we implemented an organizational redesign to reduce the number of layers of management in the company while increasing the span of the typical manager.
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
We are focused on advancing diversity, equity, and inclusion internally and externally through a variety of programs and initiatives.
Cyber and Industrial Security
The layers of cyber security we have built into our business systems and incorporated into our processes help ensure the critical data that drives the development of customer solutions is secure and protects our employees' personal information. Our good work has been recognized and we remain focused on modeling industry best practices.
We have deployed and have been relying upon a best in class industrial security program as evidenced by superior ratings from the U.S. Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA). Six of our cleared sites have been recognized with the James S. Cogswell Industrial Security Achievement Award in recent years, with our Cypress, California, and West Caldwell, New Jersey locations being recognized with this award in 2021; less than 1% of the 13,000+ cleared contractor locations receive this award annually.
Responsible Sourcing
We believe responsible sourcing and operational excellence are integral parts of value creation. We work with all our suppliers in an effort to ensure that we all adhere to an equal and high standard of sustainability and ethical principles. We provide opportunities for small businesses to engage with us as we support our customers in the aerospace, defense, and intelligence markets. We work closely with many categories of small businesses, including small disadvantaged, women-owned, veteran-owned, service-disabled veteran-owned, and historically underutilized business zone (HUBZone) companies.
Our 1MPACT initiatives include a focus on supply chain efficiency and procurement savings, which we believe will further enhance our competitiveness and value in the coming years.
Environmental Stewardship
As a technology company, we have relatively limited exposure to environmental stewardship risks in our operations. Nonetheless, we are focused on promoting environmental stewardship and introducing innovative processes and technologies that improve our efforts, including quantifying and disclosing our environmental impact along with our efforts to maximize future generations' ability to live, work, and play in our shared natural environment. We disclose in the ESG section of our website details of scope 1, scope 2, and scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from our business activities covering backup-generators and boilers for scope 1 emissions, purchased energy for scope 2 emissions, and business travel for scope 3 emissions. We have partnered with a nationally-recognized waste management vendor to ensure that our by-products and materials are reclaimed, recycled, or disposed of in ways that will reduce environmental impacts and conserve natural resources. As an environmentally-conscious company, Mercury focuses on and supports efforts that move towards a zero waste future through continuous improvement of production processes, sustainable materials management, and resource efficiency.
Facilities optimization and capital and asset efficiency are also significant themes in 1MPACT, and we believe we will create further value for all of our stakeholders as we use our resources more efficiently.
x
Further Information
Please see the ESG section of our website, www.mrcy.com, under "Company" for detailed disclosures on our commitment to sustainability and ESG practices. Information contained on our website and social media channels does not constitute part of this proxy statement or our annual report on Form 10-K.
xi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| Page | |||||
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF THREE CLASS I DIRECTORS | |||||
REPORT OF THE HUMAN CAPITAL AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE | |||||
| TABULAR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DISCLOSURE | |||||
HUMAN CAPITAL AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION | |||||
| DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS | |||||
| SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2023 ANNUAL MEETING | |||||
Appendix A — Amended and Restated 2018 Stock Incentive Plan | |||||
xii
MERCURY SYSTEMS, INC.
50 MINUTEMAN ROAD
ANDOVER, MA 01810
(978) 256-1300
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THESE PROXY MATERIALS AND VOTING
Why am I receiving these materials?
We are mailing this proxy statement, with the accompanying proxy card, to you on or about September 8, 2022 in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Mercury Systems, Inc. ("Mercury") for the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on October 26, 2022, and any adjournment or postponement of that meeting. The meeting will be held on October 26, 2022, beginning at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time at our headquarters at 50 Minuteman Road, Andover, Massachusetts 01810. You are invited to attend the meeting, and we request that you vote on the proposals described in this proxy statement. You do not need to attend the meeting to vote your shares. You may vote by internet, telephone, or mail in order to have your shares voted at the meeting on your behalf.
What am I voting on?
There are four matters scheduled for a vote:
•election of three Class I directors nominated by the Board of Directors, each to serve for a three-year term, and in each case until their successors are duly elected and qualified;
•an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers (the "say-on-pay" vote);
•approval of our amended and restated 2018 stock incentive plan; and
•ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2023.
Who can attend and vote at the meeting?
Shareholders of record at the close of business on August 24, 2022 are entitled to attend and vote at the meeting. Each share of our common stock is entitled to one vote on all matters to be voted on at the meeting, and can be voted only if the record owner is present to vote or is represented by proxy. The proxy card provided with this proxy statement indicates the number of shares of common stock that you own and are entitled to vote at the meeting.
What is the Admission Policy for the Annual Meeting?
All holders of Mercury shares as of the record date are encouraged to attend the annual meeting. In order to ensure the safety of all attendees, we have implemented the following security and admission policies.
•Eligible Attendees. Attendance is limited to registered and beneficial Mercury shareholders as of the record date.
•Admission Procedures. In order to be admitted to the meeting, you must present both an admission ticket and valid government-issued photo identification, such as a driver's license or passport. You must register on or prior to October 14, 2022 in order to obtain an admission ticket.
•Obtaining an Admission Ticket. In order to obtain an admission ticket, please email us at annualmeeting@mrcy.com.
•Security Measures. Upon entering the meeting facility, you may be required to proceed through a security checkpoint. In addition, cameras, recording equipment, electronic devices, large bags, briefcases, and packages will not be permitted in the annual meeting.
What constitutes a quorum at the meeting?
The presence at the meeting, in person or represented by proxy, of the holders of a majority of our common stock outstanding on August 24, 2022, the record date, will constitute a quorum for purposes of the meeting. On the record date, 57,778,675 shares of our common stock were outstanding. For purposes of determining whether a quorum exists, proxies received but marked "abstain" and so-called "broker non-votes" (described below) will be counted as present.
1
How do I vote my shares?
•Beneficial Shareholders. If you own shares through a broker, bank, or other holder of record (that is, your shares are held in "street name"), you must instruct the holder of record how to vote your shares. In order to provide voting instructions to the holder of record of your shares, please refer to the materials forwarded by your broker, bank, or other holder of record. If your shares are held in "street name" and you wish to vote them online at the meeting, you must obtain from your broker a properly executed legal proxy identifying you as a Mercury shareholder, authorizing you to act on behalf of the broker at the meeting, and specifying the number of shares with respect to which the authorization is granted. Proxies submitted by internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on October 26, 2022.
•Registered Shareholders. If you own shares that are registered in your name, you may vote by proxy before the annual meeting by internet at www.envisionreports.com/MRCY, by calling 1-800-652-VOTE (8683), or by signing and returning your proxy card. To vote by internet or telephone, you will need your voting control number, which can be found on your proxy card. Proxies submitted by internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on October 26, 2022. If you return a signed proxy card but do not provide voting instructions for some or all of the matters to be voted on, your shares will be voted on all uninstructed matters in accordance with the recommendations of the Board.
•Shareholders Through the Mercury Systems 401(k) Plan. If you own shares through the Mercury Systems 401(k) plan, you may vote by proxy before the annual meeting by internet at www.envisionreports.com/MRCY, by calling 1-800-652-VOTE (8683), or by signing and returning your proxy card. To vote by internet or telephone, you will need your voting control number, which can be found on your proxy card. Proxies submitted by internet or telephone must be received by 1:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on October 24, 2022. If you return a signed proxy card but do not provide voting instructions for some or all of the matters to be voted on, your shares will be voted on all uninstructed matters in accordance with the recommendations of the Board.
If you sign, date, and return the proxy card but do not specify how your shares are to be voted, then your proxy will vote your shares as follows:
•FOR the election of the three nominees for Class I directors named below under "Proposal 1: Election of Three Class I Directors;"
•FOR the approval of, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement;
•FOR the approval of our amended and restated 2018 Stock Incentive Plan;
•FOR the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2023; and
•in the proxy's discretion as to any other business which may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.
What discretion does my broker have to vote my shares held in "street name"?
A broker holding your shares in "street name" must vote those shares according to any specific instructions it receives from you. If specific instructions are not received, your broker may vote your shares in its discretion, depending on the type of proposal involved. Under applicable rules, there are certain matters on which brokers may not vote without specific instructions from you, such as the election of directors, the advisory vote on say-on-pay, and the approval of our stock incentive plan. If such matters come before the meeting and you have not specifically instructed your broker how to vote your shares, your shares will not be voted on those matters, giving rise to what is called a "broker non-vote." Shares represented by broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining the existence of a quorum for the transaction of business, but for purposes of determining the number of shares voting on a particular proposal, broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast or shares voting.
Can I change my vote after I return my proxy card?
•Beneficial Shareholders. Beneficial shareholders should contact their broker, bank, or other holder of record for instructions on how to revoke their proxies or change their vote.
•Registered Shareholders. Registered shareholders may revoke their proxies or change their voting instructions at any time before 1:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on October 26, 2022, by submitting a proxy via internet, telephone, or mail that is
2
dated later than the original proxy or by delivering written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary. Registered shareholders may also revoke their proxies or change their vote by attending the annual meeting and voting by ballot.
•Shareholders Through the Mercury Systems 401(k) Plan. If you hold shares through the Mercury Systems 401(k) plan, you may revoke your proxy or change your voting instructions at any time before 1:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on October 24, 2022, by submitting a proxy via internet, telephone, or mail that is dated later than the original proxy or by delivering written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary.
Your attendance at the meeting will not be deemed to revoke a previously delivered proxy unless you clearly indicate at the meeting that you intend to revoke your proxy and vote in person at the meeting.
How are votes counted?
•Election of directors. A director nominee receiving a majority of the votes properly cast at the meeting for the nominee's election (meaning he or she receives more votes cast "FOR" than cast "WITHHOLD") will be elected director. Abstentions and broker non-votes, which are described above, will have no effect on the outcome of voting on these matters.
•All other proposals. All of the other proposals at the meeting require the favorable vote of a majority of the votes cast on the matter. Abstentions and broker non-votes, as applicable, which are described above, will have no effect on the outcome of voting on these matters.
How is Mercury soliciting proxies?
We bear the cost of preparing, assembling, and mailing the proxy material relating to the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors for the meeting. In addition to the use of the mails, certain of our officers and regular employees may, without additional compensation, solicit proxies in person, by telephone, or by other means of communication. We will also request brokerage houses, custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries to forward copies of the proxy material to those persons for whom they hold shares, and will reimburse those record holders for their reasonable expenses in transmitting this material.
We have engaged Okapi Partners LLC ("Okapi") to assist in the solicitation of proxies and provide related advice and informational support, for agreed services fees and reimbursement of customary disbursements and expenses. In addition to fees and expenses for services provided through the date of the meeting, Okapi's fee in connection with the proxy solicitation for this meeting is not expected to exceed $75,000.
3
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF THREE CLASS I DIRECTORS
The following table provides summary information about our Directors as of the date of this proxy statement.
| Committee Memberships | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Director Since | Primary Occupation | Independent | AC | HC | NGC | GRC | M&A | ||||||||||||||||||
Mark Aslett Class II Director Term Ending in 2023 | 2007 | President and CEO Mercury Systems | No | M | ||||||||||||||||||||||
William L. Ballhaus Class I Director Nominated for a Term Ending in 2025 | 2022 | Former CEO Blackboard Inc. and SRA International Inc. | Yes | M | M | M | ||||||||||||||||||||
James K. Bass Class I Director Term Ending in 2022 | 2010 | Former President and CEO Piper Aircraft | Yes | M, F | M | |||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando P. Carvalho Class III Director Term Ending in 2024 | 2020 | Former Executive Vice President Aeronautics, Lockheed Martin | Yes | M | M | M | ||||||||||||||||||||
Michael A. Daniels Class I Director Term Ending in 2022 | 2010 | Former Chairman and CEO Mobile 365 and Network Solutions | Yes | M | M | M | C | |||||||||||||||||||
Lisa S. Disbrow Class I Director Nominated for a Term Ending in 2025 | 2017 | Under Secretary of the U.S. Air Force (Retired) | Yes | M, F | M | C | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mary Louise Krakauer Class II Director Term Ending in 2023 | 2017 | Former Executive Dell and EMC | Yes | C | M | |||||||||||||||||||||
Howard L. Lance Class I Director Nominated for a Term Ending in 2025 | 2022 | Former President and CEO Maxar Technologies Inc. and Harris Corporation | Yes | M | M | M | M | |||||||||||||||||||
Barry R. Nearhos Class III Director Term Ending in 2024 | 2018 | Former Managing Partner PricewaterhouseCoopers | Yes | C,F | M | M | ||||||||||||||||||||
William K. O'Brien Chairman of the Board Class II Director Term Ending in 2023 | 2008 | Former Executive Chairman Enterasys Networks | Yes | M, F | C | M | ||||||||||||||||||||
Debora A. Plunkett Class III Director Term Ending in 2024 | 2021 | Federal Senior Executive National Security Agency (Retired) | Yes | M | M | M | ||||||||||||||||||||
| AC = Audit Committee | GRC = Government Relations Committee | M = Member | ||||||||||||
| HC = Human Capital and Compensation Committee | M&A = M&A and Finance Committee | C = Committee Chair | ||||||||||||
| NGC = Nominating and Governance Committee | F = Financial Expert | |||||||||||||
4
Who sits on the Board of Directors?
Our by-laws provide for a Board of Directors of not fewer than three nor more than fifteen directors. As permitted by Massachusetts law, the Board of Directors is divided into three classes, with each class consisting, as nearly as may be possible, of one-third of the whole number of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors currently consists of eleven members, with William L. Ballhaus, James K. Bass, Michael A. Daniels, Lisa S. Disbrow, and Howard L. Lance serving as Class I directors, Mark Aslett, Mary Louise Krakauer, and William K. O'Brien serving as Class II directors, and Orlando P. Carvalho, Barry R. Nearhos, and Debora Plunkett serving as Class III directors.
The terms of the Class I, Class II, and Class III directors expire in 2022, 2023, and 2024, respectively. With the expiration of its respective term, each class is nominated for election for a subsequent three-year term. We are proposing that William L. Ballhaus, Lisa S. Disbrow, and Howard L. Lance, three continuing Class I directors, be elected to serve terms of three years, and in each case until their successors are duly elected and qualified or until they sooner die, resign, or are removed. Ms. Disbrow was most recently elected as a Class I director at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Messrs. Ballhaus and Lance were appointed to the Board in June 2022 as part of settlements with JANA Partners and Starboard Value executed in June 2022. James K. Bass and Michael A. Daniels, Class I directors, informed the Board of Directors that they will retire from service on the Board at the end of their current terms effective at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. We thank Messrs. Bass and Daniels for their service on the Board since 2010.
Per the settlements with JANA Partners and Starboard Value, Messrs. Ballhaus and Lance have each been appointed to the Nominating and Governance Committee and the M&A and Finance Committee and Mr. Lance has been appointed to the Human Capital and Compensation Committee.
Directors' Qualifications and Diversity
The Board of Directors believes that the Board, as a whole, should possess a combination of skills, professional experience, and backgrounds necessary to oversee the Company's business. In addition, the Board of Directors believes that there are certain attributes that every director should possess, as reflected in the Board's membership criteria. Accordingly, the Board of Directors and the Nominating and Governance Committee consider the qualifications of directors and director candidates individually and in the broader context of the Board of Directors' overall composition and the Company's current and future needs.
The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for developing and recommending Board of Director membership criteria to the Board for approval. The criteria include independent and sound judgment, integrity, the ability to commit sufficient time and attention to Board of Director activities, and the absence of conflicts with the Company's interests. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee periodically evaluates the composition of the Board of Directors to assess the skills and experience that are currently represented on the Board of Directors as well as the skills and experience that the Board of Directors will find valuable in the future, given the Company's current situation and strategic plans.
Our Board of Directors Policy recognizes the benefits that diversity brings to the Board and states that the Board has a goal to reflect gender, ethnic, and racial diversity in its membership. Having a Board composed of individuals with diverse skills, experience, backgrounds and perspectives means: competitive advantage; robust understanding of opportunities, issues and risks; inclusion of different concepts, ideas, and relationships; enhanced decision-making and dialogue; and heightened capacity for oversight of the organization and its governance. For purposes of Board composition, diversity includes, but is not limited to, business and industry skills and experience, gender, and ethnicity. The Board shall make good use of these differences and distinctions among individuals in determining the optimum composition of the Board. All Board appointments should collectively reflect the diverse nature of the business environment in which the Company operates and be made on merit, in the context of the skills, experience, independence, and knowledge which the Board requires to be effective.
In evaluating director candidates, and considering incumbent directors for renomination to the Board of Directors, the Nominating and Governance Committee considers, among other things, each nominee's independence, financial literacy, personal and professional accomplishments, and experience, including the following:
5
| Experience/ Qualification | Relevance to Mercury | |||||||||||||
| Public Co. CEO | Experience as the chief executive officer of a publicly-traded company provides us with insights and understanding of the challenges of operating a business with multiple stakeholders with various and at times competing time horizons for return on investment. | |||||||||||||
| Senior Leadership | Experience in significant leadership positions provides us with new insights and demonstrates key management disciplines that are relevant to the oversight of our business. | |||||||||||||
| Defense Industry | Extensive experience in the defense industry provides an understanding of the complex environment in which we operate and is highly important to strategic planning and oversight of our business operations. | |||||||||||||
| Technology Industry | Experience with secure sensor processing, rugged servers, mission computers, safety-critical avionics, radio frequency components, multifunction assemblies and subsystems provides an understanding of the complex operations of our business as well as the labor markets in which we compete for talent. | |||||||||||||
| Corporate Governance | An understanding of organizations and governance supports management accountability, transparency, and protection of shareholder interests. | |||||||||||||
| Risk Management | Risk management experience is critical in overseeing the risks we face today and those emerging risks that could present in the future. | |||||||||||||
| Finance and Accounting | Finance and accounting experience is important in understanding and reviewing our business operations, strategy, and financial results. | |||||||||||||
| Business Operations and Strategic Planning | An understanding of business operations and processes, and experience making strategic decisions, are critical to the oversight of our business, including the assessment of our strategic operating plan and business strategy. | |||||||||||||
| Regulatory | An understanding of laws and regulations is important because we operate in a highly regulated industry and we are directly affected by government actions. | |||||||||||||
| Talent Management | We place great importance on attracting and retaining superior talent, and motivating employees to achieve desired enterprise and individual performance objectives. | |||||||||||||
| Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A) | Experience with acquiring and integrating companies through M&A transactions is important to understanding our acquisition growth strategy. | |||||||||||||
| Debt and Equity Capital Markets | Debt and equity capital markets experience is important because we use the capital markets, along with cash generated from operations, to finance our growth agenda. | |||||||||||||
6
Board Skills Matrix for Continuing Non-Employee Directors
| Skill/ Qualification | William K. O'Brien | William L. Ballhaus | Orlando P. Carvalho | Lisa S. Disbrow | Mary Louise Krakauer | Howard L. Lance | Barry R. Nearhos | Debora A. Plunkett | ||||||||||||||||||
| Public Co. CEO | • | • | • | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Leadership | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ||||||||||||||||||
| Defense Industry | • | • | • | • | • | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Technology Industry | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | |||||||||||||||||||
| Corporate Governance | • | • | • | • | • | • | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Risk Management | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ||||||||||||||||||
| Finance and Accounting | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | |||||||||||||||||||
| Business Operations & Strategic Planning | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ||||||||||||||||||
| Regulatory | • | • | • | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Talent Management | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | • | ||||||||||||||||||
| Mergers & Acquisitions | • | • | • | • | • | • | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt & Equity Capital Markets | • | • | • | • | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mercury Board Tenure (years) | 14 | — | 2 | 5 | 5 | — | 4 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other Public Company Boards | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 3 | — | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Board Diversity Matrix for Continuing Directors | |||||||||||
| Total # of Directors: | 9 | ||||||||||
| Part I: Gender Identity | Female | Male | |||||||||
| Directors | 3 | 6 | |||||||||
| Part II: Demographic Background | |||||||||||
| African American or Black | 1 | ||||||||||
| White | 2 | 6 | |||||||||
Recommendation
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of the nominees listed below.
7
Information about the Directors
The persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy card will vote, unless authority is withheld, for the election of the three Class I nominees named below. We have no reason to believe that any of the nominees will be unavailable for election. However, if any one of them becomes unavailable, the persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy card have discretionary authority to vote for a substitute chosen by the Board, except that any nominations to replace Messrs. Ballhaus or Lance are subject to approval by JANA Partners and Starboard Value, respectively, pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreements reached by us with such investors. Any vacancies not filled at the meeting may be filled by the Board.
The following information was provided by each of the incumbent directors whose term will continue after the meeting.
Class I Directors - Nominated for a Term Ending in 2025:
 | William L. Ballhaus | |||||||||||||
Age: 55 | Committee Memberships: | |||||||||||||
Director Since: 2022 | Audit M&A and Finance Nominating and Governance | |||||||||||||
Primary Occupation: | ||||||||||||||
| Former CEO, Blackboard Inc. and SRA International Inc. | ||||||||||||||
| Description of Business Experience: | Skills and Qualifications: | |||||||||||||
Mr. Ballhaus currently serves as Chairman of MilestoneRoad Partners, a business consulting firm he founded in 2021, and as Executive Chairman at Government Brands LLC, a provider of software and payments solutions for government customers. He previously served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Blackboard, a leading EdTech company, from 2016 until its merger with Anthology in 2021. Prior to that, he served as Chief Executive Officer and President of SRA International, Inc., a provider of information technology services from 2011 until the creation of CSRA from SRA and CSC’s U.S. public sector business. Before that, Mr. Ballhaus served as Chief Executive Officer and President of private military contractor DynCorp International from 2008 to 2010. Mr. Ballhaus has also held senior leadership positions at BAE Systems, Boeing, and Hughes where he led global government and commercial technology businesses particularly focused on software and IT. He currently serves on the Board of Directors of Qmulos, a leading cybersecurity and IT compliance company, and as a senior advisor at PSG, a private equity firm focused on the software industry. He is also a Fellow of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Mr. Ballhaus' qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include his extensive experience in the defense industry and his executive and operational experience as the Chief Executive Officer of public and private companies. | Public Co. CEO Senior Leadership Defense Industry Technology Industry Corporate Governance Risk Management Finance and Accounting Business Operations & Strategy Regulatory Talent Management Mergers & Acquisitions Debt and Equity Capital Markets | |||||||||||||
Other Public Company Directorships Held in the Last Five Years: | ||||||||||||||
| Blackboard, Inc. (2016 - 2021) | ||||||||||||||
8
 | Lisa S. Disbrow | |||||||||||||
Age: 59 | Committee Memberships: | |||||||||||||
Director Since: 2017 | Audit Government Relations (Chair) Human Capital & Compensation | |||||||||||||
Primary Occupation: | ||||||||||||||
| Under Secretary of the Air Force (Retired) | ||||||||||||||
| Description of Business Experience: | Skills and Qualifications: | |||||||||||||
Ms. Disbrow retired as the U.S. Senate-confirmed Under Secretary of the Air Force in 2017, responsible for the affairs of the Air Force, including organizing, training, equipping, and providing for the welfare of approximately 660,000 active duty, Guard, Reserve and civilian Airmen, worldwide. She oversaw the Air Force's annual budget of over $132 billion dollars and directed strategy and policy development, risk management, weapons requirements and acquisition, technology investments, and human resource management across a global enterprise. Ms. Disbrow served as the Acting Secretary of the Air Force from January through May 2017. In 2014, Ms. Disbrow was confirmed by the Senate as the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Financial Management and Comptroller, the principal senior official on all financial matters with a financial workforce of 10,000 personnel world-wide. She served in multiple senior positions on the Joint Staff and on the National Security Council at the White House. Ms. Disbrow was commissioned into the U.S. Air Force in 1985 and retired in 2008 as a Colonel with over 23 years of total active and reserve service. Ms. Disbrow is one of our "audit committee financial experts." Ms. Disbrow's qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include her extensive military and budget experience in the Company's target defense market, her defense procurement experience, and her knowledge of defense and aerospace technology. | Senior Leadership Defense Industry Technology Industry Risk Management Finance and Accounting Business Operations & Strategy Regulatory Talent Management | |||||||||||||
Other Public Company Directorships Held in the Last Five Years: | ||||||||||||||
| Blackberry Limited (2019 - present) | ||||||||||||||
| CACI International Inc. (2021 - present) | ||||||||||||||
| Perspecta, Inc. (2018 - 2021) | ||||||||||||||
9
 | Howard L. Lance | |||||||||||||
Age: 66 | Committee Memberships: | |||||||||||||
Director Since: 2022 | Government Relations Human Capital & Compensation M&A and Finance Nominating & Governance | |||||||||||||
Primary Occupation: | ||||||||||||||
| Former President and CEO, Maxar Technologies, Inc. and Harris Corporation | ||||||||||||||
| Description of Business Experience: | Skills and Qualifications: | |||||||||||||
Howard L. Lance is currently Managing Partner at Lance Advisors LLC, an advisory firm serving private equity and institutional investors. He serves as non-executive Chairman of Summit Materials, a leading provider of aggregates and cement, and as non-executive Chairman of Change Healthcare, a leading provider of healthcare information technology and services. He also serves as a Director of New Vista Acquisition Corporation, a SPAC focused on emerging technologies in aerospace, defense and logistics, and as non-executive Chairman of privately-held Covanta Energy LLC, a leading provider of sustainable environmental solutions. He previously served on the public-company boards of Ferrovial S.A., Eastman Chemical Company, Stryker Corporation, and Aviat Networks. Mr. Lance was President and Chief Executive Officer of Maxar Technologies, a leading provider of space technology solutions including satellites, robotics, geospatial imagery and services from 2016 to 2019. Previously, he was Executive Advisor – Private Equity at the Blackstone Group from 2012 to 2016. He served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Harris Corporation (now L3Harris), a leading global provider of communications and information technology products, software, systems and services to government, defense, and commercial markets, from 2003 to 2012. He was Co-President of NCR Corporation and Chief Operating Officer of its Retail and Financial Group from 2001 to 2002. Previously, he spent 17 years at Emerson Electric Company including as Executive Vice President of its Electronics and Telecom businesses, Group President of its Climate Technologies businesses, and Chief Executive Officer of Astec PLC, a UK-listed subsidiary based in Hong Kong. Mr. Lance's qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include his extensive experience in the defense industry and his executive and operational experience as the Chief Executive Officer of public companies. | Public Co. CEO Senior Leadership Defense Industry Technology Industry Corporate Governance Risk Management Finance and Accounting Business Operations & Strategy Regulatory Talent Management Mergers & Acquisitions Debt and Equity Capital Markets | |||||||||||||
Other Public Company Directorships Held in the Last Five Years: | ||||||||||||||
| Summit Materials, Inc. (2012 - present) | ||||||||||||||
| Change Healthcare, Inc. (2017 - present) | ||||||||||||||
| New Vista Acquisition Corp. (2021 - present) | ||||||||||||||
| Maxar Technologies Inc. (2016 - 2019) | ||||||||||||||
10
Class II Directors - Serving a Term Ending in 2023:
 | Mark Aslett | |||||||||||||
Age: 54 | Committee Memberships: | |||||||||||||
Director Since: 2007 | Government Relations | |||||||||||||
Primary Occupation: | ||||||||||||||
| President and CEO, Mercury Systems, Inc. | ||||||||||||||
| Description of Business Experience: | Skills and Qualifications: | |||||||||||||
| Mr. Aslett has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since November 2007. Prior to that, he was Chief Operating Officer and Chief Executive Officer of Enterasys Networks, a public technology company, from 2003 to 2006, and held various positions with Marconi plc and its affiliated companies, including Executive Vice President of Marketing, Vice President of Portfolio Management, and President of Marconi Communications—North America, from 1998 to 2002. Mr. Aslett served on the Board of Directors of Enterasys Networks from 2004 to 2006. He has also held positions at GEC Plessey Telecommunications, as well as other telecommunications-related technology firms. Mr. Aslett provides an insider's perspective in Board discussions about the business and strategic direction of the Company with his detailed knowledge of the Company's employees, customers, suppliers, business prospects, and markets. | Public Co. CEO Senior Leadership Defense Industry Technology Industry Corporate Governance Risk Management Finance and Accounting Business Operations & Strategy Regulatory Talent Management Mergers & Acquisitions Debt and Equity Capital Markets | |||||||||||||
Other Public Company Directorships Held in the Last Five Years: | ||||||||||||||
| None | ||||||||||||||
11
 | Mary Louise Krakauer | |||||||||||||
Age: 65 | Committee Memberships: | |||||||||||||
Director Since: 2017 | Human Capital & Compensation (Chair) Government Relations | |||||||||||||
Primary Occupation: | ||||||||||||||
| Former Executive, Dell and EMC | ||||||||||||||
| Description of Business Experience: | Skills and Qualifications: | |||||||||||||
Ms. Krakauer retired as the Executive Vice President, Chief Information Officer of Dell Corporation in 2017, where she was responsible for global IT. She served as the Executive Vice President, Chief Information Officer of EMC Corporation in 2016. Prior to that she served as EVP, Business Development, Global Enterprise Services for EMC Corporation during 2015. From 2012 to 2015 she was Executive Vice President, Global Human Resources for EMC Corporation, responsible for developing and executing a talent strategy in support of the business strategy, including executive and employee recruitment and development, compensation and benefits, acquisition integration and succession planning. Previously, she led large businesses as COO, Technology Services & Solutions and Managed Services at EMC Corporation, and VP/General Manager of multiple services businesses at Hewlett-Packard Corporation, Compaq Computer Corporation, and Digital Equipment Corporation. She was a director of Xilinx Inc., a publicly-traded adaptive and intelligent computing company, from 2017 through its acquisition by AMD in 2022, and DXC Technology Co., a publicly-traded IT services company, from 2018 to 2022. Ms. Krakauer has been a director of Proterra Inc., a publicly-traded electric vehicle technology company, since 2021, and Cadence Design Systems Inc., a publicly-traded software company, since 2022. Ms. Krakauer's qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include her extensive executive experience in the technology industry, including leading large businesses, as well as the IT and Human Resources functions of a public company. | Senior Leadership Technology Industry Corporate Governance Risk Management Business Operations & Strategy Talent Management Mergers & Acquisitions | |||||||||||||
Other Public Company Directorships Held in the Last Five Years: | ||||||||||||||
| Proterra Inc. (2021 - present) | ||||||||||||||
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. (2022 - present) | ||||||||||||||
| Xilinx Inc. (2017 - 2022) | ||||||||||||||
| DXC Technology Co. (2018 - 2022) | ||||||||||||||
12
 | William K. O'Brien | |||||||||||||
Age: 78 | Committee Memberships: | |||||||||||||
Director Since: 2008 | Chairman of the Board Audit M&A and Finance Nominating & Governance (Chair) | |||||||||||||
Primary Occupation: | ||||||||||||||
| Former Executive Chairman, Enterasys Networks | ||||||||||||||
| Description of Business Experience: | Skills and Qualifications: | |||||||||||||
| Mr. O'Brien served as Executive Chairman at Enterasys Networks, a public technology company, from 2003 until his retirement in 2006. He served as Chief Executive Officer of Enterasys from 2002 to 2004, and as a member of the Board of Directors of Enterasys from 2002 to 2006. Prior to working at Enterasys, he worked for PricewaterhouseCoopers where he held several different senior management positions. Mr. O'Brien had over 33 years of experience in auditing and professional services while at PricewaterhouseCoopers. He was a director of Virtusa Corporation, a publicly-traded IT services and outsourcing company, from 2008 to 2020. Mr. O'Brien is one of our "audit committee financial experts." Mr. O'Brien's qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include his executive experience in the technology industry, including being the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of a public technology company, and his strong accounting and financial expertise. | Public Co. CEO Senior Leadership Technology Industry Corporate Governance Risk Management Finance and Accounting Business Operations & Strategy Mergers & Acquisitions Debt and Equity Capital Markets | |||||||||||||
Other Public Company Directorships Held in the Last Five Years: | ||||||||||||||
| Virtusa Corporation (2008 - 2020) | ||||||||||||||
13
Class III Directors - Serving a Term Ending in 2024:
 | Orlando P. Carvalho | |||||||||||||
Age: 64 | Committee Memberships: | |||||||||||||
Director Since: 2020 | Human Capital & Compensation M&A and Finance Nominating and Governance | |||||||||||||
Primary Occupation: | ||||||||||||||
| Former Executive Vice President, Aeronautics, Lockheed Martin | ||||||||||||||
| Description of Business Experience: | Skills and Qualifications: | |||||||||||||
| Mr. Carvalho has over 38 years of experience in the aerospace and defense industry with Lockheed Martin. Before his retirement from Lockheed Martin in 2018, he was Executive Vice President of Lockheed Martin's Aeronautics business, a 24,000-employee enterprise. Mr. Carvalho held several integral leadership positions with Lockheed Martin, including Executive Vice President and General Manager of the F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter program, President of Lockheed Martin Mission Systems & Sensors, and General Manager and Vice President of Surface-Sea Based Ballistic Missile Defense Systems. Mr. Carvalho presently serves on the Board of Advisors for the University of Maryland Robert H. Smith School of Business and he is an Associate Fellow of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Mr. Carvalho's qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include his executive experience with defense contracting and his knowledge of defense and aerospace technology, operations, and program management. | Senior Leadership Defense Industry Technology Industry Corporate Governance Risk Management Finance and Accounting Business Operations & Strategy Regulatory Talent Management Mergers & Acquisitions | |||||||||||||
Other Public Company Directorships Held in the Last Five Years: | ||||||||||||||
| None | ||||||||||||||
14
 | Barry R. Nearhos | |||||||||||||
Age: 64 | Committee Memberships: | |||||||||||||
Director Since: 2018 | Audit (Chair) M&A and Finance Nominating and Governance | |||||||||||||
Primary Occupation: | ||||||||||||||
| Former Managing Partner, PricewaterhouseCoopers | ||||||||||||||
| Description of Business Experience: | Skills and Qualifications: | |||||||||||||
| Mr. Nearhos has over 35 years of experience with PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) providing assurance, business advisory, and other services to clients across multiple industries, including technology, life sciences, telecom, and manufacturing. Before his retirement from PwC in 2015, Mr. Nearhos was Market Managing Partner for PwC's Northeast region, responsible for directing the strategy and operations of the firm's Boston, Hartford, and Albany offices. During his tenure, he also served as the leader of PwC's Northeast Assurance practice, a position he held from 2005 until 2008, and as a partner in PwC's Assurance practice from 1989 to 2015. He was a director of Virtusa Corporation, a publicly-traded IT services and outsourcing company, from 2016 until its acquisition by private equity in 2021. Mr. Nearhos is one of our "audit committee financial experts." Mr. Nearhos' qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include his strong accounting and financial expertise. | Senior Leadership Corporate Governance Risk Management Business Operations & Strategy Finance and Accounting Mergers & Acquisitions Talent Management Debt and Equity Capital Markets | |||||||||||||
Other Public Company Directorships Held in the Last Five Years: | ||||||||||||||
| Virtusa Corporation (2016 - 2021) | ||||||||||||||
15
 | Debora A. Plunkett | |||||||||||||
Age: 62 | Committee Memberships: | |||||||||||||
| Director Since: 2022 | Audit Human Capital & Compensation Government Relations | |||||||||||||
Primary Occupation: | ||||||||||||||
| Federal Senior Executive, National Security Agency (Retired) | ||||||||||||||
| Description of Business Experience: | Skills and Qualifications: | |||||||||||||
| Ms. Plunkett's previous National Security Agency (NSA) positions include Director of Information Assurance from April 2010 to November 2014 and Deputy Director of Information Assurance from August 2008 to April 2010, where she led the agency's information assurance/cyber defense mission and directed thousands of NSA professionals worldwide. She also conceived and established the National Cyber Security Assistance Program to qualify commercial organizations for accreditation in performing cyber security services for national security systems, and advised Executive Branch decision-makers, including the National Security Council, on cyber issues. Most recently, Ms. Plunkett was the first person to serve in the newly established position of Senior Advisor to the NSA Director, from November 2014 to January 2016, with a focus on enhancing equality, diversity, and inclusion for the agency's highly technical workforce. A highly credentialed professional, Ms. Plunkett received the Distinguished Service Medal and Exceptional Civilian Service Award from the NSA Director. She was awarded the Rank of Distinguished Executive by President Barack Obama, and the Rank of Meritorious Executive by President George W. Bush. As a recognized expert in national security, she has appeared on CBS/60 Minutes and Federal News Radio, been interviewed in the Washington Post, and given keynote addresses at high-profile cyber security and defense conferences. She currently serves on the CACI International and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Boards of Directors, is a Senior Fellow at Harvard University’s Belfer Center, and a professor in the cybersecurity graduate program at the University of Maryland. Ms. Plunkett's qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors include her extensive experience in cyber and national security as well as information assurance. | Senior Leadership Defense Industry Technology Industry Risk Management Finance & Accounting Business Operations & Strategy Regulatory Talent Management | |||||||||||||
Other Public Company Directorships Held in the Last Five Years: | ||||||||||||||
| CACI International Inc. (2018 - present) | ||||||||||||||
| J. C. Penney Company, Inc. (2017 - 2020) | ||||||||||||||
16
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Corporate Governance Highlights
Our commitment to good corporate governance stems from our belief that a strong governance framework creates long-term value for our shareholders, strengthens Board and management accountability, and builds trust in us and our brand. Our governance framework includes the following highlights:
| Board and Governance Information (1) | Board and Governance Information (1) | ||||||||||
| Size of the Board of Directors | 9 | Board Meetings Held During Fiscal 2022 | 16 | ||||||||
| Number/ % of Independent Directors | 8/ 89% | Poison Pill | (3) | ||||||||
| Average Age of Independent Directors | 64 | Proxy Access | No | ||||||||
| Average Independent Director Tenure | 4 years | Code of Business Conduct and Ethics | Yes | ||||||||
| Women Board Members | 33% | Stock Ownership Guidelines: Directors & Executives | Yes | ||||||||
| Board Committees Chaired by Women | 40% | Board Refreshment: New Directors Over Past 5 Years | 7 | ||||||||
| Racial/ Ethnically Diverse Board Members | 11% | Board Policy to Reflect Diversity (Gender & Race) | Yes | ||||||||
| Classified Board of Directors | Yes | Anti-Hedging and Pledging Policies | Yes | ||||||||
| Majority Voting in Director Elections | Yes | Compensation Clawback Policy | Yes | ||||||||
| Plurality Voting in Contested Director Elections | Yes | Separate Chairman and CEO | Yes | ||||||||
| Annual Board and Committee Self-Assessments | Yes | Ongoing Shareholder Outreach and Engagement | Yes | ||||||||
| Annual Director Peer Assessments | Yes | Capital Structure with One Vote per Common Share | Yes | ||||||||
| Limited Membership on Other Public Co Boards | Yes | Succession Planning Process for Senior Management | Yes | ||||||||
| Board Committees are 100% Independent Directors | Yes (2) | Regular Executive Sessions without Management | Yes | ||||||||
(1) Reflects the retirements of Messrs. James K. Bass and Michael A. Daniels effective upon the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
(2) Each of the Audit Committee, Human Capital and Compensation Committee, Nominating and Governance Committee, and M&A and Finance Committee is comprised of 100% independent directors. Our CEO is a member of the Government Relations Committee as we believe his experience with our customers and markets adds value to this Committee.
(3) The limited duration shareholders rights agreement that the Board adopted in December 2021 expires effective upon the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Independence
The Board of Directors has determined that a majority of the members of the Board should consist of "independent directors," determined in accordance with the applicable listing standards of the Nasdaq Global Select Market as in effect from time to time. Directors who are also Mercury employees are not considered to be independent for this purpose. For a non-employee director to be considered independent, he or she must not have any direct or indirect material relationship with Mercury. A material relationship is one which, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. In determining whether a material relationship exists, the Board considers, among other things, the circumstances of any direct compensation received by a director or a member of a director's immediate family from Mercury, any professional relationship between a director or a member of a director's immediate family and Mercury's outside auditors, any participation by a Mercury executive officer in the compensation decisions of other companies employing a director or a member of a director's immediate family as an executive officer, and commercial relationships between Mercury and other entities with which a director is affiliated (as an executive officer, partner, or controlling shareholder). The Board has determined that directors who serve on the Audit Committee must qualify as independent under the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), which limit the types of compensation an Audit Committee member may receive directly or indirectly from Mercury and require that Audit Committee members not be "affiliated persons" of Mercury or its subsidiaries. In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that directors who serve on the Human Capital and Compensation Committee must satisfy the standards for being considered a "non-employee director" within the meaning of SEC Rule 16b-3.
Consistent with these considerations, the Board has determined that all of the members of the Board are independent directors, except Mr. Aslett, who is Mercury's President and Chief Executive Officer.
17
How are nominees for the Board selected?
Our Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for identifying and recommending nominees for election to the Board. The Committee will consider nominees recommended by a shareholder if the shareholder submits the nomination in compliance with applicable requirements. With respect to the nominees for Class I director standing for election at the meeting, Ms. Disbrow was most recently elected as a Class I director at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Messrs. Ballhaus and Lance were appointed to the Board in June 2022 as part of settlements with JANA Partners and Starboard Value executed in June 2022.
When considering a potential candidate for membership on the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee will consider any criteria it deems appropriate, including, among other things, the experience and qualifications of any particular candidate as well as such candidate's past or anticipated contributions to the Board and its committees. At a minimum, each nominee is expected to have high personal and professional integrity and demonstrated ability and judgment, and to be effective, with the other directors, in collectively serving the long-term interests of our shareholders. In addition to these minimum qualifications, when considering potential candidates for the Board, the Committee seeks to ensure that the Board is comprised of a majority of independent directors and that the committees of the Board, other than the Government Relations Committee, are comprised entirely of independent directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee may also consider any other standards that it deems appropriate, including whether a potential candidate has direct experience in our industry and whether such candidate, if elected, would assist in achieving a mix of directors that represents a diversity of backgrounds and experiences. Our Board Policy recognizes the benefits that diversity brings to the Board and states that the Board has a goal to reflect gender, ethnic, and racial diversity in its membership. The Committee generally will evaluate and consider all candidates recommended by our directors, officers, and shareholders. The Committee intends to consider shareholder recommendations for directors using the same criteria that would be used with potential nominees recommended by members of the Committee or others, and the Committee used such criteria when it evaluated the nominations of Messrs. Ballhaus and Lance by JANA Partners and Starboard Value, respectively, in 2022.
Shareholders who wish to submit director candidates for consideration should send such recommendations to our Secretary at our executive offices not less than, unless a lesser time period is required by applicable law, 120 days nor more than 150 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of stockholders or special meeting in lieu of an annual meeting. Such recommendations must include the following information as to each person whom the shareholder proposes to nominate for election or reelection as a director:
•the name and address of the shareholder and each of his or her nominees;
•a description of all arrangements or understandings between the shareholder and each such nominee;
•such other information as would be required to be included in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of the nominees of such shareholder; and
•the consent of each nominee to serve as a Director if so elected.
In addition, such recommendations must include the following information as to each shareholder giving the notice:
•the number of all shares of Mercury stock held of record, owned beneficially (directly or indirectly) and represented by proxy by such shareholder as of the date of such notice and as of one year prior to the date of such notice;
•a description of all arrangements or understandings between such shareholder and each nominee and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the nomination or nominations are to be made by such shareholder;
•a description of any derivative position held or beneficially held (directly or indirectly) by such shareholder with respect to Mercury stock;
•a description of any proxy, contract, arrangement, understanding, or relationship between such shareholder and any other person or persons (including their names and addresses) in connection with the nomination or nominations to be made by such shareholder or pursuant to which such shareholder has a right to vote any Mercury stock; and
•a description of any proportionate interest in Mercury stock or derivative positions with respect to Mercury held, directly or indirectly, by a general or limited partnership in which such shareholder is a general partner or, directly or indirectly, beneficially owns an interest in such a general partner.
We may require any proposed nominee to furnish such other information as may reasonably be required by us to determine the eligibility of such proposed nominee to serve as a director. Shareholders must also submit any other information regarding the proposed director candidate that is required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to SEC rules. See also the
18
information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement under the heading "Shareholder Proposals for the 2023 Annual Meeting."
Can I communicate with Mercury’s directors?
Yes. Shareholders who wish to communicate with the Board or with a particular director may send a letter to Mercury Systems, Inc., 50 Minuteman Road, Andover, Massachusetts 01810, attention: Secretary. The mailing envelope should contain a clear notation that the enclosed letter is a "Shareholder-Board Communication" or "Shareholder-Director Communication." All such letters should clearly state whether the intended recipients are all members of the Board or certain specified individual directors. Our Secretary will make copies of all such letters and circulate them to the appropriate director or directors.
What committees has the Board established?
The Board of Directors has standing Audit, Human Capital and Compensation, Nominating and Governance, M&A and Finance, and Government Relations Committees. As described above under the heading "Independence," all of the members of the Audit, Human Capital and Compensation, Nominating and Governance, and M&A and Finance Committees are deemed to be independent directors. Each of our Board committees acts under a written charter, copies of which can be found on our website at www.mrcy.com on the "Investor Relations" page under "Corporate Governance."
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight of management's conduct of our accounting and financial reporting processes, including by providing oversight with respect to the financial reports and other financial information provided by our systems of internal accounting and financial controls, and the annual audit of our financial statements. The Audit Committee also reviews the qualifications, independence, and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm, pre-approves all audit and non-audit services provided by such firm and its fees, and discusses with management and our independent registered public accounting firm the quality and adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accounting firm, which reports directly to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee also is responsible for reviewing and approving related-person transactions in accordance with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the Audit Committee charter.
Human Capital and Compensation Committee
The Human Capital and Compensation Committee is responsible for:
•setting the compensation of our executive officers;
•reviewing and approving employment agreements, consulting arrangements, severance or retirement arrangements, and change-in-control arrangements or provisions covering any of our current or former executive officers;
•overseeing the administration of our equity-based and other long-term incentive plans;
•exercising any fiduciary, administrative, or other function assigned to the committee under any of our health, benefit, or welfare plans, including our 401(k) retirement savings plan;
•reviewing the compensation and benefits for non-employee directors and making recommendations for any changes to our Board;
•overseeing the development and implementation of succession planning for our senior executives; and
•overseeing our human capital management practices, including our culture, talent recruitment, development, and retention, employee engagement, workplace safety, and diversity, equity, and inclusion.
All of the independent directors on the Board annually review and approve our CEO's corporate financial performance objectives, and evaluate the CEO's performance in light of those goals and objectives. Based on the foregoing, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee sets the CEO's compensation, including salary, target bonus, bonus and over-achievement payouts, and equity-based compensation, and any other special or supplemental benefits, which is then subject to ratification by a majority of the independent directors on our Board. Our CEO annually evaluates the contribution and performance of our other executive officers and provides input to the Human Capital and Compensation Committee, and the Committee sets their compensation. Our Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer and the Committee's independent compensation consultant also make recommendations to the Committee regarding compensation for our executives.
19
The Human Capital and Compensation Committee may delegate to the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the General Counsel, and the Chief Human Resources Officer the authority to grant equity awards under our 2018 Stock Incentive Plan to individuals who are not subject to the reporting and other requirements of Section 16 of the Exchange Act. The Committee may also delegate the administration of the health, benefit, and welfare plans within the scope of its oversight to our human resources and finance departments and to outside service providers, as appropriate.
The Human Capital and Compensation Committee is authorized to obtain advice and assistance from independent compensation consultants, outside legal counsel, and other advisors as it deems appropriate, at our expense. The Committee has engaged an outside compensation consultant, which has been Mercer since 2018, to assist the Committee in applying our compensation philosophy for our executive officers and non-employee directors, analyzing current compensation conditions in the marketplace generally and among our peers specifically, and assessing the competitiveness and appropriateness of compensation levels for our executive officers. Representatives of Mercer regularly attend Committee meetings, both with and without members of management present, and interact with members of our human resources department with respect to its assessment of the compensation for our executive officers. In addition, at the direction of the Committee, Mercer may assist management in analyzing the compensation of our non-executive employees. Mercer's services also include providing a chief medical advisor for COVID related planning and due diligence services for M&A pursuits.
The Human Capital and Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant provides input to the Committee regarding compensation for non-employee directors. The Committee then recommends any changes in the compensation and benefits for non-employee directors to the full Board for its consideration and approval.
Information regarding fees paid to Mercer can be found in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis section of this proxy statement under "Role of the Compensation Consultant".
Nominating and Governance Committee
The Nominating and Governance Committee assists the Board in identifying individuals qualified to become Board members, and recommends to the Board persons to be nominated for election as directors by the shareholders at the annual meeting of shareholders or by the Board to fill vacancies. The Committee has recommended the nominees for election at the annual meeting. The Committee oversees the process by which the Board and Committees each assesses its effectiveness as well as the individual director peer assessment process. The Committee reviews our Board of Directors Policy and reviews our environmental sustainability policies, strategies, and related disclosures and reports to the Board any recommendations for changes in the Company's governance of environmental risks and opportunities. The Committee is authorized to obtain advice and assistance from independent consultants, director search firms, outside counsel, and other advisors as it deems appropriate, at our expense.
M&A and Finance Committee
The M&A and Finance Committee assists the Board in reviewing and assessing M&A transactions. The Committee is comprised of at least three members, all independent directors, as appointed by the Board. The Committee also serves as the pricing committee for any of the Company's capital markets activities.
Government Relations Committee
The Government Relations Committee, consisting of three or more members as appointed by the Board, assists the Board with the following functions:
•identifying and evaluating global security, political, budgetary, regulatory, and other issues, trends, opportunities, and challenges that could impact our business activities and performance;
•making recommendations to continue to raise our visibility in the marketplace and awareness of our commercial business model, as well as our products and capabilities; and
•making recommendations concerning our government relations activities, including our interactions with the federal government on matters of impact to our business with the aim of enhancing our customer base.
In carrying out its duties and responsibilities, the Government Relations Committee has the authority to meet with and make inquiries of our employees as well as obtain advice and assistance from external advisors.
20
How often did the Board and Committees meet during fiscal 2022?
The Board of Directors met 16 times during fiscal 2022. The table below reports information about the membership of the committees as of July 1, 2022:
| Name | Audit Committee(1) | Human Capital & Compensation Committee | Nominating & Governance Committee | M&A and Finance Committee | Government Relations Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mark Aslett | X | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| William L. Ballhaus | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| James K. Bass | X | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Orlando P. Carvalho | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Michael A. Daniels | X | X | Chair | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lisa S. Disbrow | X | X | Chair | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mary Louise Krakauer | Chair | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Howard L. Lance | X | X | X | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Barry R. Nearhos | Chair | X | X | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| William K. O'Brien | X | Chair | X | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debora A. Plunkett | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Meetings During Fiscal 2022 | 9 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) The Board has determined that each of Messrs. Bass, Nearhos, and O'Brien and Ms. Disbrow qualified as an "audit committee financial expert" and that Mr. Ballhaus and Ms. Plunkett qualify as "financially literate" under SEC rules.
All of the directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board of Directors and committees of the Board on which they served.
Our independent directors regularly meet in executive sessions outside the presence of management. The independent directors met six times during the last fiscal year in executive session without management present. All meetings, or portions of meetings, of the Board at which only independent directors were present were presided over by Mr. O'Brien, our Chairman of the Board.
How Does Mercury Approach Board Refreshment?
To garner new ideas and perspectives, and to respond to the ever-changing needs of our stakeholders, the Board actively seeks candidates representing a range of tenures, areas of expertise, industry experience, and backgrounds. In 2017, the Board added Lisa S. Disbrow and Mary Louise Krakauer, in 2018 the Board added Barry R. Nearhos, in 2020 the Board added Orlando P. Carvalho, in 2021 the Board added Debora A. Plunkett, and in 2022 the Board added William L. Ballhaus and Howard L. Lance. Seven of the nine directors that will continue on the Board following the 2022 Annual Meeting were elected during the last five years. James K. Bass and Michael A. Daniels, both Class I directors, informed the Board of Directors that they will retire from service on the Board at the end of their current term effective at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Does Mercury have a policy regarding director attendance at annual meetings of the shareholders?
Directors are encouraged to attend the annual meeting of shareholders, or special meeting in lieu thereof; however, we do not have a formal policy with respect to attendance at shareholder meetings. All of the directors then in office attended the 2021 annual meeting of shareholders.
Does Mercury have stock ownership guidelines for directors?
Each non-employee director is expected to own or control, directly or indirectly, shares of the Company's common stock equal to five times the value of the annual director cash retainer within five years of first becoming a non-employee director. Each non-employee director is expected to retain such investment in the Company as long as he or she is a non-employee director. Exceptions to this stock ownership guideline may be approved from time to time by the Board as it deems necessary to address individual circumstances. All of our non-employee directors are in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines.
21
Does Mercury have a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics?
Yes. We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to our officers, directors, and employees. This code is posted on our website at www.mrcy.com on the "Investor Relations" page under "Corporate Governance." We intend to satisfy our disclosure requirements regarding any amendment to, or waiver of, a provision of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by disclosing such matters on our website.
Does Mercury have a Human Rights Policy?
Yes. We have adopted a Human Rights Policy applicable to our employees and our suppliers. Our Human Rights Policy is posted on our website at www.mrcy.com on the "Investor Relations" page under "Corporate Governance." This Policy goes beyond mere compliance with law. When differences arise between standards and legal requirements, the stricter standard applies, in compliance with applicable law. We also expect our employees and suppliers to conduct themselves in accordance with all other Mercury policies, including the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
Does Mercury have a Supplier Code of Conduct?
Yes. We have adopted a Supplier Code of Conduct. Our Supplier Code of Conduct is posted on our website at www.mrcy.com. Our Supplier Code establishes minimum expectations and requirements for suppliers, as well as their employees, subcontractors, and agents in connection with their business dealings with Mercury. We encourage suppliers to go beyond the principles outlined in the Supplier Code and to observe the highest international standards. If a matter is not expressly addressed in the Supplier Code, we expect suppliers to use good judgment and respect the spirit of the Supplier Code.
Does Mercury have a method for the anonymous reporting of accounting, legal, and ethical concerns?
Yes. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, our Human Rights Policy, and our Supplier Code of Conduct each include a means for the anonymous reporting of any concerns about accounting, legal, and ethical matters. Any employee, supplier, customer, shareholder, or other interested party can submit a report via the following anonymous methods:
•by telephone voicemail at 866-277-5739; or
•by submitting a complaint via the internet at www.whistleblowerservices.com/mrcy.
Does Mercury have a written policy governing related-person transactions?
Yes. We have adopted a written policy which provides for the review and approval by the Audit Committee of transactions involving Mercury in which a related person is known to have a direct or indirect interest and that are required to be reported under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. For purposes of this policy, a related person includes: (1) any of our directors, director nominees, or executive officers; (2) any known beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities; or (3) any immediate family member of any of the foregoing. In situations where it is impractical to wait until the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Audit Committee or to convene a special meeting of the Committee, the Chair of the Committee has been delegated authority to review and approve related-person transactions. Transactions subject to this policy may be pursued only if the Audit Committee (or the Chair of the Committee acting pursuant to delegated authority) determines in good faith that, based on all the facts and circumstances available, the transactions are in, or are not inconsistent with, the best interests of Mercury and our shareholders.
Does Mercury make corporate political contributions?
No, we do not use corporate funds for political contributions. If we were to use corporate funds for political activities, per our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, any such contribution would require approval by the Board of Directors.
Does Mercury have a shareholder rights agreement?
The limited duration shareholder rights agreement adopted by the Board in December 2021 expires effective as of the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Does Mercury regularly engage with its shareholders?
Yes. Our executive officers and the Board believe that shareholder engagement is an important component of our governance practices. The Chairman of the Board and the Chair of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee, as well as
22
members of management, engage with shareholders on a variety of matters, such as corporate governance, executive compensation, and sustainability and have been responsive to the feedback provided by shareholders. Our shareholder engagement program is a year-round process that includes an investor day, regular participation at investment conferences, and our engagement with shareholders on non-deal roadshows at which our executives regularly meet with shareholders.
How Does the Board of Directors Exercise Its Oversight of Risk?
Our Chief Executive Officer and senior management are principally responsible for risk identification, management, and mitigation. Our senior management engages in an enterprise risk management ("ERM") process each fiscal year. The process consists of an annual assessment of risks and an ongoing review of risk mitigation efforts and assessment of new risk developments. At regularly scheduled Board meetings, our Senior Director of Internal Audit reviews the key risks identified in the ERM process and management's plans for mitigating such risks. Our directors have the opportunity to evaluate such risks and mitigation plans, to ask questions of management regarding those risks and plans, and to offer their ideas and insights to management as to these and other perceived risks and the implementation of risk mitigation plans.
In addition to discussions at regular Board meetings, the Audit Committee focuses on risks related to accounting, internal controls, financial and tax reporting, and related-party transactions; the Human Capital and Compensation Committee focuses on risks associated with our executive compensation policies and practices, executive succession planning, and human capital management practices and metrics; the Nominating and Governance Committee focuses on risks associated with non-compliance with SEC and Nasdaq requirements for director independence, the implementation of our corporate governance policies, and environmental sustainability policies and strategies; the M&A and Finance Committee focuses on risks related to our acquisition activities; and the Government Relations Committee focuses on risks to our business from governmental actions, including the defense budget and continuing budget resolutions.
How is the Leadership of the Board of Directors Structured and How Does this Leadership Structure Impact Risk Oversight?
Our Board Policy provides that the Chairman of the Board will be elected from among the independent directors, barring the Board's specific determination otherwise. If, in its judgment the Board determines that election of a non-independent Chairman would best serve the Company at a particular time, such a Chairman would be excluded from executive sessions of the independent directors. In such case, a Lead Independent Director, as appointed from time to time, would preside over executive sessions and would perform such other duties as might be determined from time to time by the Board.
The Board has determined that having a separate Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is the most appropriate leadership structure for the Board of Directors at this time. However, the roles of Chairman and CEO may be filled by the same or different individuals. This allows the Board of Directors flexibility to determine whether the two roles should be combined in the future based upon the Company's needs and the Board of Directors' assessment of the Company’s leadership from time to time.
As discussed above, our Chief Executive Officer and senior management are principally responsible for risk identification, management, and mitigation through our ERM process. Our Chairman of the Board is responsible for providing leadership for the Board, including the Board's evaluation of management's ERM process.
The Board of Directors meets in executive session without management present at most quarterly Board meetings and the Audit Committee meets in executive session at most quarterly Committee meetings, as well as having regular executive sessions with our Senior Director of Internal Audit and our independent registered public accounting firm.
Does Mercury have a commitment to sustainability and provide information on its Environmental, Social, and Governance ("ESG") practices?
Please see the Executive Summary of this proxy statement as well as the ESG section of our website, www.mrcy.com, under "Company" for detailed disclosures on our commitment to sustainability and ESG practices. Information contained on our website and social media channels does not constitute part of this proxy statement or our annual report on Form 10-K.
Does Mercury have a commitment to culture and values?
We are aware that the workforce required to grow our business and deliver creative solutions is rich in diversity of thought, experience, and culture. Our diversity and inclusion focus on building and maintaining the talent that will create cohesive and collaborative teams that drive innovation.
Our industry leadership is attributable to the spirit and commitment of our employees.
23
We are a destination employer for high performing, diverse, global talent. We strive to deliver a world-class employee experience in a fast paced, energetic, and innovative environment that values results, caring, and learning.
We are dedicated to providing a world class employee experience and maximizing the potential of our greatest asset — our people. We embrace growth and the opportunity it brings, with a focus on: a healthy, vibrant, high performance culture; organizational effectiveness; a robust talent pipeline; compensation that recognizes and rewards success; and lifelong learning and mentoring.
We are committed to making Mercury a great place to work, no matter where our employees are located. We offer a casual and enjoyable work environment and encourage employees to get involved. Our social committees at each site organize a range of engagement activities including: holiday celebrations, participation in community events such as blood drives and organized family-friendly events.
At Mercury, we believe in building strong communities both inside our company and in the areas where we live and work. We are committed to our vision for strong communities, and we are taking action to achieve our goals. We strive to positively impact our local and global communities and understand that an important part of our success is giving back. As a community, we participate in charitable and educational initiatives around the world, donating time and contributing financially to community organizations focused on our country's youth and armed/veteran services. Additionally, our team members are involved in numerous community service and fundraising events throughout the year.
24
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The Human Capital and Compensation Committee performs an annual review of non-employee director compensation. Our director compensation philosophy is to provide our non-employee directors with competitive compensation. Our compensation philosophy is intended to offer compensation that attracts highly qualified non-employee directors and retain the leadership and skills necessary to build long-term shareholder value. Directors who are also our employees receive no additional compensation for serving on the Board of Directors.
Fiscal 2022
During fiscal 2022, our non-employee directors received an annual cash retainer of $65,000 and the following positions received additional cash retainers:
| Independent Chairman of the Board | $45,000 per annum | |||||||
| Chairman of the Audit Committee | 25,000 per annum | |||||||
| Chairman of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee | 20,000 per annum | |||||||
| Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee | 12,000 per annum | |||||||
| Chairman of the Government Relations Committee | 12,000 per annum | |||||||
| Chairman of the M&A and Finance Committee | 12,000 per annum | |||||||
All of these retainers are paid in cash in quarterly installments. Directors are also reimbursed for their reasonable expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board and committee meetings.
New non-employee directors are granted restricted stock awards in connection with their first election to the Board. These awards are granted by the Board of Directors and consist of shares of restricted stock for the number of shares of common stock equal to $225,000 divided by the average closing price of our common stock during the 30 calendar days prior to the date of grant. These awards vest as to 50% of the covered shares on each of the first two anniversaries of the date of grant.
Non-employee directors also receive annual restricted stock awards for the number of shares of common stock equal to $175,000 divided by the average closing price of our common stock during the 30 calendar days prior to the date of grant. These awards vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant.
Non-employee directors will not be eligible to receive an annual restricted stock award for the fiscal year in which they are first elected.
The compensation paid to the non-employee members of the Board of Directors with respect to fiscal 2022 was as follows:
Non-Employee Director Compensation
| Name | Fees Earned | Restricted Stock Awards ($)(1) | Total | |||||||||||||||||
| William L. Ballhaus | $ | 16,250 | $ | 222,592 | $ | 238,842 | ||||||||||||||
| James K. Bass | 65,000 | 179,911 | 244,911 | |||||||||||||||||
| Orlando P. Carvalho | 65,000 | 179,911 | 244,911 | |||||||||||||||||
| Michael A. Daniels | 77,000 | 179,911 | 256,911 | |||||||||||||||||
| Lisa S. Disbrow | 77,000 | 179,911 | 256,911 | |||||||||||||||||
| Mary Louise Krakauer | 85,000 | 179,911 | 264,911 | |||||||||||||||||
| Howard L. Lance | 16,250 | 222,592 | 238,842 | |||||||||||||||||
| Barry R. Nearhos | 90,000 | 179,911 | 269,911 | |||||||||||||||||
| William K. O'Brien | 122,000 | 179,911 | 301,911 | |||||||||||||||||
| Debora A. Plunkett | 48,750 | 231,357 | 280,107 | |||||||||||||||||
(1)This column represents the grant date fair value of restricted stock awards for fiscal 2022 in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value of the restricted stock awards granted to non-employee directors in fiscal 2022 has been calculated by multiplying the number of shares granted by the closing price of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on the date of grant.
25
The aggregate number of unvested restricted stock awards outstanding for each non-employee director at July 1, 2022 was as follows:
| Name | Aggregate Unvested Restricted Stock Awards (# of shares) | ||||
| William L. Ballhaus | 3,767 | ||||
| James K. Bass | 3,518 | ||||
| Orlando P. Carvalho | 3,518 | ||||
| Michael A. Daniels | 3,518 | ||||
| Lisa S. Disbrow | 3,518 | ||||
| Mary Louise Krakauer | 3,518 | ||||
| Howard L. Lance | 3,767 | ||||
| Barry R. Nearhos | 3,518 | ||||
| William K. O’Brien | 3,518 | ||||
| Debora A. Plunkett | 4,524 | ||||
Fiscal 2023
The Human Capital and Compensation Committee, with the assistance of the Committee's independent compensation consultant, performed its annual review of the Company's compensation for non-employee directors. Based on market data, including data for our peer groups, the Committee recommended, and the Board of Directors approved, no changes to the compensation for non-employee directors for fiscal 2023.
26
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
The following table sets forth information as of July 1, 2022 with respect to existing compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance.
| Plan Category | Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights (1) | Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans (excluding securities reflected in the first column) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders (2) | — | (3) | $ | — | 505,103 | (4) | |||||||||||||||||
| Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
| TOTAL | — | $ | — | 505,103 | |||||||||||||||||||
(1)Does not include outstanding unvested restricted stock awards.
(2)Consists of our 2018 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated to date ("2018 Plan"), and our 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended and restated to date ("ESPP").
(3)Does not include purchase rights under the ESPP, as the purchase price and number of shares to be purchased is not determined until the end of the relevant purchase period.
(4)Includes 192,211 shares available for future issuance under the 2018 Plan and 312,892 shares available for future issuance under the ESPP.
27
PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ("SAY-ON-PAY")
Pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, we provide our shareholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on a nonbinding, advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
As described in greater detail under the heading "Compensation Discussion and Analysis," we seek to closely align the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our shareholders. Our compensation programs are designed to reward our named executive officers for the achievement of short-term and long-term strategic and operational goals, which should result in increased value for our shareholders, while at the same time avoiding the encouragement of unnecessary or excessive risk-taking.
Required Vote
This vote is advisory, which means that the vote on executive compensation is not binding on us, our Board of Directors, or the Human Capital and Compensation Committee. The vote on this resolution is not intended to address any specific element of compensation, but rather relates to the overall compensation of our named executive officers, as described in this proxy statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. To the extent there is a significant vote against our named executive officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address our shareholders’ concerns.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes properly cast is required to approve this Proposal 2.
Accordingly, we ask our shareholders to vote on the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:
"RESOLVED, that the Company's shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table, and the other related tables and disclosure."
Recommendation
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement.
28
PROPOSAL 3: APPROVAL OF AMENDED AND RESTATED 2018 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
In July 2022, our Board of Directors adopted, subject to the approval of our shareholders, our amended and restated 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2018 Plan") to increase the number of shares available for issuance by 2,000,000 shares.
Summary of Changes
In order to be able to make anticipated grants, the Board has amended the 2018 Plan to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2018 Plan by an additional 2,000,000 shares. If the shareholders approve the proposed amendment and restatement of the 2018 Plan, the additional shares to be issued under the 2018 Plan will be authorized but unissued shares.
As of July 1, 2022, there were 192,211 shares available for issuance under the 2018 Plan, with 2,072,391 outstanding time-based and performance-based restricted and deferred shares. As of July 1, 2022, there were also 233,513 contingent restricted share units outstanding ("Contingent RSUs") that are subject to shareholder approval of our amended and restated 2018 Plan in order to be convertible into shares of our common stock. The Contingent RSUs are not reflected in the calculation of the 192,211 shares available for future issuance under the 2018 Plan as set forth above. In the event shareholders approve our amended and restated 2018 Plan, the Contingent RSUs will be outstanding under the 2018 Plan immediately thereafter, which will reduce the number of shares available for issuance under the 2018 Plan accordingly. There were no stock options outstanding under the 2018 Plan as of July 1, 2022. We believe the additional 2,000,000 shares requested for the plan, together with the shares available under the plan, should last for two fiscal years depending on our organic growth, future M&A transactions, and changes in the price of our common stock.
Corporate Governance and Best Practice Highlights
The 2018 Plan and our corporate guidelines reflect best practices in equity compensation, including:
•awards do not vest solely on account of a change in control (requires a qualifying termination following a change in control or an acquiring company refusing to assume outstanding awards);
•no repricing of stock options or stock appreciation rights;
•no discounted stock options or stock appreciation rights;
•awards are subject to forfeiture provisions;
•the plan does not allow for "liberal share counting" (that is, reuse of shares tendered, exchanged, or withheld to cover option exercise costs, any award shares withheld to cover taxes, and all shares underlying an award of stock appreciation rights once such stock appreciation rights are exercised);
•the plan does not contain any "evergreen" provisions that automatically add shares to the plan reserve;
•the plan does not contain tax gross-ups;
•no payment of dividends or dividend equivalents on unvested awards;
•we require executives and directors to comply with significant stock ownership guidelines;
•we prohibit hedging and pledging of company stock;
•the plan contains limits on individual awards;
•the plan contains minimum vesting and performance periods;
•the plan is administered by a committee of independent directors; and
•we regularly present the plan to shareholders for approval (the plan was last submitted for approval in 2020).
Summary of the Amended and Restated 2018 Plan
The following is a summary of certain major features of the 2018 Plan. This summary is subject to the specific provisions contained in the full text of the 2018 Plan, which is attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement.
Plan Administration. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee has full power to select, from among the individuals eligible for awards, the individuals to whom awards will be granted, to make any combination of awards to participants, and to determine the specific terms and conditions of each award, subject to the provisions of the 2018 Plan. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee may delegate to our CEO, our Chief Human Resources Officer, or any executive
29
officer the authority to grant awards at fair market value to employees who are not subject to the reporting and other provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
Eligibility and Limitations on Grants. Persons eligible to participate in the 2018 Plan are those full or part-time officers, employees, non-employee directors, and other key persons (including consultants) of the Company and its subsidiaries as selected from time to time by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee. As of July 1, 2022, approximately 2,400 individuals were eligible to participate in the 2018 Plan. The closing price per share of our common stock as reported by the Nasdaq Global Select Market was $64.00 on July 1, 2022.
Shares Reserved for Issuance. Of the 5,862,000 shares of our common stock, par value $.01 per share, authorized for issuance under the 2018 Plan, there were only 192,000 shares remaining available for issuance as of July 1, 2022. If the proposed amendment to the plan is approved by shareholders, the aggregate number of shares reserved and available for issuance will be increased by 2,000,000 shares, and the total number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2018 Plan from its inception will be increased from 5,862,000 shares to 7,862,000 shares. With this change, the maximum number of shares of stock reserved and available for issuance under the 2018 Plan will be 7,862,000 shares, plus the number of shares of stock reserved and available for issuance under the Company's Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2005 Stock Incentive Plan") as of October 24, 2018, the date of shareholder approval of the original 2018 Plan. For purposes of this limitation, the shares of stock underlying any awards that are forfeited, are canceled, expire or are terminated (other than by exercise) under (i) the 2018 Plan and (ii) from and after shareholder approval of the 2018 Plan, the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, shall be added to the shares of stock available for issuance under the 2018 Plan. Shares tendered or held back upon exercise of an option or settlement of an award to cover the exercise price or tax withholding shall not be available for future issuance under the 2018 Plan. In addition, upon exercise of stock appreciation rights, the gross number of shares exercised shall be deducted from the total number of shares remaining available for issuance under the 2018 Plan. Also, shares purchased in the open market using proceeds received upon the exercise of a stock option shall not be available for future issuance under the 2018 Plan. The maximum award of stock options or stock appreciation rights granted to any one individual will not exceed 500,000 shares of common stock (subject to adjustment for stock splits and similar events) for any calendar year period.
Effect of Grants. The grant of any award other than a stock option or a stock appreciation right will reduce the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2018 Plan by 2.0 shares of common stock for each such share actually subject to the award. The grant of a stock option or a stock appreciation right will be deemed as an award of one share of common stock for each such share actually subject to the award.
Stock Options. The 2018 Plan permits the granting of (1) options to purchase common stock intended to qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Code and (2) options that do not so qualify. Options granted under the 2018 Plan will be non-qualified options if they fail to qualify as incentive options or exceed the annual limit on incentive stock options. Non-qualified options may be granted to any persons eligible to receive incentive options and to non-employee directors and key persons. The option exercise price of each option will be determined by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee but may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. The 2018 Plan provides for 7,862,000 shares that can be granted in the form of incentive stock options. No dividends or dividend equivalents shall be paid on stock options.
The term of each option will be fixed by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee and may not exceed seven years from the date of grant. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee will determine at what time or times each option may be exercised. Options may be made exercisable in installments and the exercisability of options may be accelerated by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee. Options may be exercised in whole or in part with written notice to the Company.
Upon exercise of options, the option exercise price must be paid in full (1) in cash, by certified or bank check, or other instrument acceptable to the Human Capital and Compensation Committee, (2) by delivery (or attestation to the ownership) of shares of common stock that are beneficially owned by the optionee, (3) subject to applicable law, by a broker pursuant to irrevocable instructions to the broker from the optionee, or (4) by net exercise.
To qualify as incentive options, options must meet additional federal tax requirements, including a $100,000 limit on the value of shares subject to incentive options that first become exercisable by a participant in any one calendar year.
In the event stock options awarded to employees have a performance-based goal, the vesting period will be at least one year, and in the event any stock options awarded to employees have a time-based restriction, the vesting period will be at least three years, but vesting can occur incrementally over the three-year period. No portion of any stock option granted to employees may vest prior to the first anniversary of the grant date.
Stock Appreciation Rights. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee may award a stock appreciation right either as a freestanding award or in tandem with a stock option. The Committee may award stock appreciation rights subject to such conditions and restrictions as the Committee may determine, provided that (1) upon exercise of a stock appreciation right
30
granted in tandem with an option, the applicable portion of any related option shall be surrendered, and (2) stock appreciation rights granted in tandem with options are exercisable at such time or times and to the extent that the related stock options are exercisable. The term of each stock appreciation right may not exceed seven years. No dividends or dividend equivalents shall be paid on stock appreciation rights.
In the event awards made to employees have a performance-based goal, the restriction period will be at least one year, and in the event any awards made to employees have a time-based restriction, the restriction period will be at least three years, but vesting can occur incrementally over the three-year period. No portion of any stock appreciation right granted to employees may vest prior to the first anniversary of the grant date.
Restricted Stock. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee may award shares of common stock to participants subject to such conditions and restrictions as the Committee may determine. These conditions and restrictions may include the achievement of certain performance goals and/or continued employment with the Company through a specified restricted period. However, in the event awards made to employees have a performance-based goal, the restriction period will be at least one year, and in the event any awards made to employees have a time-based restriction, the restriction period will be at least three years, but vesting can occur incrementally over the three-year period. No portion of any restricted stock award granted to employees may vest prior to the first anniversary of the grant date. Cash dividends and stock dividends, if any, with respect to restricted stock shall be withheld by the Company for the grantee's account, and shall be subject to forfeiture to the same degree as the shares of restricted stock to which such dividends relate. Except as otherwise determined by the Committee, no interest will accrue or be paid on the amount of any cash dividends withheld.
Deferred Stock Awards. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee may award phantom stock units as deferred stock awards to participants. Deferred stock awards are ultimately payable in the form of shares of common stock and may be subject to such conditions and restrictions as the Committee may determine. These conditions and restrictions may include the achievement of certain performance goals and/or continued employment with the Company through a specified vesting period. However, in the event awards made to employees have a performance-based goal, the restriction period will be at least one year, and in the event any awards have a time-based restriction, the restriction period will be at least three years, but vesting can occur incrementally over the three-year period. No portion of any deferred stock award granted to employees may vest prior to the first anniversary of the grant date. In the Committee's sole discretion and subject to the participant's compliance with the procedures established by the Committee and requirements of Section 409A of the Code, it may permit a participant to make an advance election to receive a portion of his or her future cash compensation otherwise due in the form of a deferred stock award. During the deferral period, a grantee shall have no rights as a shareholder; provided, however, that the grantee may be credited with dividend equivalent rights with respect to the phantom stock units underlying his or her deferred stock award, subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine, but shall not be entitled to dividends, if any, or dividend equivalents prior to settlement.
Performance-Based Awards. The 2018 Plan provides that the Human Capital and Compensation Committee may require that the vesting of awards be conditioned on the satisfaction of one or more of the performance criteria.
Detrimental Activity. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee may cancel, rescind, suspend, or otherwise limit any award to a participant if the participant engages in detrimental activities, including rendering services to a competitor of the Company, disclosing confidential information without permission, refusing to assign inventions to the Company, soliciting employees or customers of the Company, engaging in an activity that results in a termination for cause, materially violating any internal policies of the Company, or being convicted of, or pleading guilty to, a crime.
Tax Withholding. Participants in the 2018 Plan are responsible for the payment of any federal, state, or local taxes that we are required by law to withhold upon any option exercise or vesting of other awards. Subject to approval by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee, depending on the withholding method, a grantee may elect to have such grantee’s tax withholding obligation satisfied at the minimum or other applicable withholding rate in the grantee’s applicable jurisdiction, including maximum applicable rates that may be utilized without creating adverse accounting treatment under Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (or any successor pronouncement thereto) and permitted under applicable withholding rules promulgated by the Internal Revenue Service or another applicable governmental entity, in whole or in part, by (i) authorizing the Company to withhold from shares of stock to be issued pursuant to any award a number of shares with an aggregate fair market value (as of the date the withholding is effected) that would satisfy such withholding amount, or (ii) transferring to the Company shares of stock owned by the grantee with an aggregate fair market value (as of the date the withholding is effected) that would satisfy such withholding amount.
Change of Control Provisions. The 2018 Plan provides that, if there is a change in control of the Company that is approved by the Board of Directors, if the grantee has a minimum of six months of service and within six months of the
consummation of the change of control, the grantee’s employment is involuntarily terminated by us for reasons other than for
"cause" or the grantee resigns for "good reason", 100% of such grantee’s unvested awards will become vested and immediately
exercisable. If, in connection with the change of control, awards granted under the 2018 Plan are cancelled or otherwise
31
terminated upon consummation of the change of control, then instead of accelerated vesting, the grantee will receive a cash
payment for 100% of the value of his or her unvested awards (determined based on the price of our common stock at the time of consummation of the change of control). The foregoing is conditioned on the grantee’s execution of an effective release of
claims if the value of the accelerated vesting or cash payment exceeds $25,000.
If there is a change of control that is not approved by the Board of Directors, all of the unvested awards under the 2018 Plan (regardless of the grant date) will become vested and immediately exercisable upon the change of control. Further, upon any change of control all outstanding awards held by non-employee directors will automatically become fully vested.
Amendments and Termination. The Board may at any time amend or discontinue the 2018 Plan, and the Human Capital and Compensation Committee may at any time amend or cancel any outstanding award for the purpose of satisfying changes in the law or for any other lawful purpose. However, no such action may adversely affect any rights under any outstanding award without the holder's consent. Any amendments that materially change the terms of the 2018 Plan, including any amendments that increase the number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2018 Plan, expand the types of awards available under the 2018 Plan, materially expand the eligibility to participate in the 2018 Plan, materially extend the term of the 2018 Plan, or materially change the method of determining the fair market value of common stock, will be subject to approval by shareholders. Amendments shall also be subject to approval by our shareholders if and to the extent determined by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee to be required by the Code to preserve the qualified status of incentive options. In addition, except in connection with a reorganization or other similar change in the capital stock of the Company or a merger or other transaction, without prior shareholder approval, the Committee may not reduce the exercise price of an outstanding stock option or stock appreciation right or effect repricing of an outstanding stock option or stock appreciation right through cancellation or regrants.
No Repricing of Awards Without Stockholder Approval. Notwithstanding any other provision of the 2018 Plan, the
repricing of awards shall not be permitted without stockholder approval. For this purpose, a "repricing" means any of the following (or any other action that has the same effect as any of the following): (1) changing the terms of an award to lower its
exercise or base price (other than on account of capital adjustments resulting from share splits, etc.); (2) any other action that is
treated as a repricing under GAAP; and (3) repurchasing for cash or canceling an award in exchange for another award at a time
when its exercise or base price is greater than the fair market value of the underlying share of stock, unless the cancellation and
exchange occurs in connection with a capital adjustment event.
Grantees Outside of the United States. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee may modify the terms of any award under the 2018 Plan made to or held by a grantee who is then a resident, or is primarily employed or providing services, outside of the United States in any manner deemed by the Committee to be necessary or appropriate in order that such award shall conform to laws, regulations, and customs of the country in which the grantee is then a resident or primarily employed or providing services, or so that the value and other benefits of the award to the grantee, as affected by non–U.S. tax laws and other restrictions applicable as a result of the grantee's residence, employment, or providing services abroad, shall be comparable to the value of such award to a grantee who is a resident, or is primarily employed or providing services, in the United States. An award may be modified in a manner that is inconsistent with the express terms of the 2018 Plan, so long as such modifications will not contravene any applicable law or regulation or result in actual liability under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act for the grantee whose award is modified. Additionally, the Committee may adopt such procedures and sub-plans as are necessary or appropriate to permit participation in the 2018 Plan by eligible persons who are non–U.S. nationals or are primarily employed or providing services outside the United States.
Data Privacy. As a condition of receipt of any award, each grantee explicitly and unambiguously consents to the collection, use, and transfer, in electronic or other form, of personal data by and among, as applicable, the Company and its affiliates for the exclusive purpose of implementing, administering, and managing the 2018 Plan and awards. The Company and its affiliates may hold certain personal information about a grantee, including, but not limited to, the grantee’s name, home address, telephone number, date of birth, social security or insurance number or other identification number, salary, nationality, job title(s), information regarding any securities of the Company or any of its affiliates, and details of all Awards (the "Data"). In addition to transferring the Data amongst themselves as necessary for the purpose of implementation, administration, and management of the 2018 Plan and awards, the Company and its affiliates may each transfer the Data to any third parties assisting the Company in the implementation, administration, and management of the 2018 Plan and awards. Recipients of the Data may be located in the grantee's country or elsewhere, and the grantee's country and any given recipient's country may have different data privacy laws and protections. The Company may cancel the grantee’s eligibility to participate in the 2018 Plan, and in the Committee's discretion, the grantee may forfeit any outstanding awards if the grantee refuses or withdraws the consents described above.
32
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
Awards of restricted stock under the 2018 Plan generally are not subject to federal income tax when awarded, unless the participant properly elects to accelerate the tax recognition. Restricted stock is generally subject to ordinary income tax at the time the restrictions lapse. We are entitled to a corresponding deduction at the time the participant recognizes taxable income on the restricted stock.
Stock options under the 2018 Plan may either be granted as incentive stock options, which are intended to comply with the requirements of Internal Revenue Code Section 422 or as non-qualified stock options. Generally, no federal income tax is
payable by the recipient upon the grant of an incentive stock option and no deduction is taken by us. If certain holding periods are met, the exercise of an incentive stock option does not result in taxation to the recipient; rather, the recipient is taxed only at the time of sale. If the shares have been held for at least one year after the date of exercise and at least two years from the date of grant of the option, the recipient will be taxed on any appreciation in excess of the exercise price as long-term capital gains. In that event, we are not entitled to a deduction for the amount of the capital gains. Under current tax laws, if a recipient exercises a non-qualified stock option, the recipient will be taxed on the difference between the fair market value of the stock on the exercise date and the exercise price and, thereafter, the recipient would receive capital gains on any appreciation in stock value after the exercise date, depending upon the length of time the recipient held the stock after exercise. When the option is exercised, we will be entitled to a corresponding tax deduction.
New Plan Benefits
It is not possible to state the persons who will receive options or awards under the 2018 Plan in the future or the amount of options or awards that will be granted under the 2018 Plan. The following table provides information with respect to the value of annual long-term incentive ("LTI") awards for fiscal 2022, excluding the value of special LTI awards granted to employees in February 2022.
| Restricted Stock | ||||||||||||||
| Name and Position | Dollar Value(1) | Number of Shares(2) | ||||||||||||
Mark Aslett, President and Chief Executive Officer | $ | 4,300,000 | 67,188 | |||||||||||
Michael D. Ruppert, EVP, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | 1,430,000 | 22,344 | ||||||||||||
Thomas Huber, EVP and Chief Transformation Officer | 2,000,000 | 31,250 | ||||||||||||
James M. Stevison, EVP and Chief Growth Officer | 1,600,000 | 25,000 | ||||||||||||
Charles R. Wells, IV, EVP and President of Microelectronics | 1,600,000 | 25,000 | ||||||||||||
| All named executive officers as a group | 10,930,000 | 170,782 | ||||||||||||
| All non-employee directors as a group | 1,935,918 | 30,249 | ||||||||||||
| Employees as a group (excluding named executive officers) | 40,440,384 | 631,881 | ||||||||||||
(1) Reflects the dollar value of all grants awarded in fiscal 2022, excluding the value of special LTI awards granted to employees in February 2022.
(2) Reflects the dollar value set forth in the table divided by the closing price of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on on July 1, 2022 ($64.00 per share).
Required Vote
Approval of the amended and restated 2018 Plan requires the affirmative FOR vote of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal. Unless marked to the contrary, proxies received will be voted FOR approval of the amended and restated 2018 Plan.
Recommendation
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the amendment and restatement of the 2018 Plan.
33
PROPOSAL 4: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has appointed KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023. We are asking shareholders to ratify this appointment. Although ratification by shareholders is not required by law or by our by-laws, the Audit Committee believes that submission of its selection to shareholders is a matter of good corporate governance. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time if the Audit Committee believes that such a change would be in the best interests of Mercury and our shareholders. If our shareholders do not ratify the selection of KPMG, the Audit Committee will take that fact into consideration, together with such other factors it deems relevant, in determining its next selection of an independent registered public accounting firm.
Representatives of KPMG will attend the annual meeting, where they will have the opportunity to make a statement if they wish to do so and will be available to answer appropriate questions from shareholders.
Required Vote
Approval of the ratification of the appointment of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2023 requires the affirmative FOR vote of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal. Unless marked to the contrary, proxies received will be voted FOR approval of the ratification of the appointment.
Recommendation
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2023.
34
VOTING SECURITIES
Who owns more than 5% of our stock?
On August 24, 2022, there were 57,778,675 shares of our common stock outstanding. On that date, to our knowledge, there were six shareholders who owned beneficially more than 5% of our common stock. The table below contains information, as of the dates noted below, regarding the beneficial ownership of these persons or entities. The "Percent of Class" was calculated using the number of shares of our common stock outstanding as of August 24, 2022. Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that each of the persons or entities listed below has sole voting and investment power with respect to all of the shares of common stock indicated.
| Name of Beneficial Owner | Number of Shares Beneficially Owned | Percent of Class | ||||||||||||
| BlackRock, Inc. (1) | 5,462,413 | 9.5% | ||||||||||||
| The Vanguard Group, Inc. (2) | 5,166,909 | 8.9 | ||||||||||||
| Starboard Value LP (3) | 4,156,831 | 7.2 | ||||||||||||
| Conestoga Capital Advisors LLC (4) | 3,662,721 | 6.3 | ||||||||||||
| William Blair Investment Management, LLC (5) | 3,317,822 | 5.7 | ||||||||||||
| JANA Partners LLC (6) | 3,235,880 | 5.6 | ||||||||||||
(1)Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Black Rock, Inc. with the SEC on February 1, 2022, reporting beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2021. The reporting entity's address is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055.
(2)Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by Vanguard Group, Inc. with the SEC on February 10, 2022, reporting beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2021. The reporting entity's address is 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, PA 19355.
(3)Based on a Schedule 13D/A filed by Starboard Value LP with the SEC on June 24, 2022, reporting beneficial ownership as of June 23, 2022. The reporting entity's address is 201 E. Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1000, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301.
(4)Based on a Schedule 13G filed by Conestoga Capital Advisors LLC with the SEC on January 10, 2022, reporting beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2021. The reporting entity's address is 550 E. Swedesford Road, Suite 120, Wayne, PA 19087.
(5)Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by William Blair Investment Management, LLC with the SEC on February 10, 2022, reporting beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2021. The reporting entity's address is 150 North Riverside Plaza, Chicago, IL 60606.
(6)Based on a Schedule 13D/A filed by JANA Partners LLC with the SEC on June 27, 2022, reporting beneficial ownership as of June 23, 2022. The reporting entity's address is 767 Fifth Avenue, 8th Floor, New York, New York 10153.
35
How much stock does each of Mercury’s directors and named executive officers own?
The following information is furnished as of August 24, 2022, with respect to common stock beneficially owned by: (1) our directors (including our CEO); (2) our CFO and the three most highly compensated executive officers other than the CEO and the CFO; and (3) all directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, the individuals named below held sole voting and investment power over the shares listed.
| Number of Shares Beneficially Owned (1) | Percent of Class (1) | |||||||||||||
| Mark Aslett (2) | 528,143 | ** | ||||||||||||
| William L. Ballhaus (3) | 8,832 | ** | ||||||||||||
| James K. Bass (4) | 67,634 | ** | ||||||||||||
| Orlando P. Carvalho (5) | 8,596 | ** | ||||||||||||
| Michael A. Daniels (6) | 81,366 | ** | ||||||||||||
| Lisa S. Disbrow (7) | 15,384 | ** | ||||||||||||
| Mary Louise Krakauer (8) | 15,384 | ** | ||||||||||||
| Howard L. Lance (9) | 8,767 | ** | ||||||||||||
| Barry R. Nearhos (10) | 12,013 | ** | ||||||||||||
| William K. O'Brien (11) | 63,115 | ** | ||||||||||||
| Debora A. Plunkett (12) | 4,524 | ** | ||||||||||||
| Thomas Huber (13) | 70,119 | ** | ||||||||||||
| Michael D. Ruppert (14) | 205,401 | ** | ||||||||||||
| James M. Stevison (15) | 61,272 | ** | ||||||||||||
| Charles R. Wells, IV (16) | 61,416 | ** | ||||||||||||
| All directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons) (17) | 1,211,696 | 2.1 | % | |||||||||||
* The address for each director and executive officer is c/o Mercury Systems, Inc., 50 Minuteman Road, Andover, Massachusetts 01810.
** Less than 1.0%.
(1)The number and percent of the shares of common stock with respect to each beneficial owner are calculated by assuming that all shares which may be acquired by such person within 60 days of August 24, 2022 are outstanding.
(2)Includes (a) 208,428 shares owned by Mr. Aslett individually; (b) 319,368 restricted shares awarded to Mr. Aslett under our stock-based plans (as to which Mr. Aslett has sole voting power, but which are subject to restrictions on transfer); and (c) 77 shares owned indirectly by Mr. Aslett through the company stock fund in our 401(k) plan.
(3)Includes (a) 5,065 shares owned by Mr. Ballhaus individually; and (b) 3,767 restricted shares awarded to Mr. Ballhaus under our stock-based plans (as to which Mr. Ballhaus has sole voting power, but which are subject to restrictions on transfer).
(4)Includes (a) 64,116 shares owned by Mr. Bass individually; and (b) 3,518 restricted shares awarded to Mr. Bass under our stock-based plans (as to which Mr. Bass has sole voting power, but which are subject to restrictions on transfer).
(5)Includes (a) 5,078 shares owned by Mr. Carvalho individually; and (b) 3,518 restricted shares awarded to Mr. Carvalho under our stock-based plans (as to which Mr. Carvalho has sole voting power, but which are subject to restrictions on transfer).
(6)Includes (a) 77,848 shares owned by Mr. Daniels individually; and (b) 3,518 restricted shares awarded to Mr. Daniels under our stock-based plans (as to which Mr. Daniels has sole voting power, but which are subject to restrictions on transfer).
(7)Includes (a) 11,866 shares owned by Ms. Disbrow individually; and (b) 3,518 restricted shares awarded to Ms. Disbrow under our stock-based plans (as to which Ms. Disbrow has sole voting power, but which are subject to restrictions on transfer).
(8)Includes (a) 11,866 shares owned by Ms. Krakauer individually; and (b) 3,518 restricted shares awarded to Ms. Krakauer under our stock-based plans (as to which Ms. Krakauer has sole voting power, but which are subject to restrictions on transfer).
36
(9)Includes (a) 5,000 shares owned by Mr. Lance individually; and (b) 3,767 restricted shares awarded to Mr. Lance under our stock-based plans (as to which Mr. Lance has sole voting power, but which are subject to restrictions on transfer).
(10)Includes (a) 8,495 shares owned by Mr. Nearhos individually; and (b) 3,518 restricted shares awarded to Mr. Nearhos under our stock-based plans (as to which Mr. Nearhos has sole voting power, but which are subject to restrictions on transfer).
(11)Includes (a) 5,606 shares owned by Mr. O'Brien individually; (b) 53,991 shares owned by family trusts controlled by Mr. O’Brien; and (c) 3,518 restricted shares awarded to Mr. O’Brien under our stock-based plans (as to which Mr. O’Brien has sole voting power, but which are subject to restrictions on transfer).
(12)Includes 4,524 restricted shares awarded to Ms. Plunkett under our stock-based plans (as to which Ms. Plunkett has sole voting power, but which are subject to restrictions on transfer).
(13)Includes (a) 70,039 restricted shares awarded to Mr. Huber under our stock-based plans (as to which Mr. Huber has sole voting power, but which are subject to restrictions on transfer); and (b) 80 shares owned indirectly by Mr. Huber through the company stock fund in our 401(k) plan.
(14)Includes (a) 105,944 shares owned by Mr. Ruppert individually; (b) 99,377 restricted shares awarded to Mr. Ruppert under our stock-based plans (as to which Mr. Ruppert has sole voting power, but which are subject to restrictions on transfer); and (c) 80 shares owned indirectly by Mr. Ruppert through the company stock fund in our 401(k) plan.
(15)Includes (a) 61,192 restricted shares awarded to Mr. Stevison under our stock-based plans (as to which Mr. Stevison has sole voting power, but which are subject to restrictions on transfer); and (b) 80 shares owned indirectly by Mr. Stevison through the company stock fund in our 401(k) plan.
(16)Includes (a) 368 shares owned by Mr. Wells individually; (b) 60,968 restricted shares awarded to Mr. Wells under our stock-based plans (as to which Mr. Wells has sole voting power, but which are subject to restrictions on transfer); and (c) 80 shares owned indirectly by Mr. Wells through the company stock fund in our 401(k) plan.
(17)Includes (a) 563,492 shares owned by directors and executive officers individually or by family trusts controlled by directors individually; (b) 647,628 restricted shares awarded to the directors and executive officers under our stock-based plans (as to which each has sole voting power, but which are subject to restrictions on transfer); and (c) 397 shares owned indirectly by executive officers through the company stock fund in our 401(k) plan.
37
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Who are Mercury’s executive officers?
The following persons are our executive officers:
| Name | Age | Position | ||||||||||||
| Mark Aslett | 54 | President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||||||||||
| Christopher C. Cambria | 64 | Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary | ||||||||||||
| Thomas Huber | 45 | Executive Vice President and Chief Transformation Officer | ||||||||||||
| Brian E. Perry | 55 | Executive Vice President and President of Processing | ||||||||||||
| Michael D. Ruppert | 48 | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer | ||||||||||||
| James M. Stevison | 56 | Executive Vice President and Chief Growth Officer | ||||||||||||
| Charles R. Wells, IV | 50 | Executive Vice President and President of Microelectronics | ||||||||||||
Our executive officers are appointed to office by the Board of Directors at the first board meeting following the Annual Meeting of Shareholders or at other board meetings as appropriate, and hold office until the first board meeting following the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until a successor is chosen, subject to prior death, resignation or removal.
Information regarding our executive officers as of the date of filing of this proxy statement is presented below.
| Mark Aslett | ||||||||||
| Mark Aslett joined Mercury in 2007 and has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the Board since 2007. Prior to joining Mercury, he was Chief Operating Officer and Chief Executive Officer of Enterasys Networks from 2003 to 2006, and held various positions with Marconi plc and its affiliated companies, including Executive Vice President of Marketing, Vice President of Portfolio Management, and President of Marconi Communications-North America, from 1998 to 2002. Mr. Aslett has also held positions at GEC Plessey Telecommunications, as well as other telecommunications-related technology firms. | |||||||||||
 | Christopher C. Cambria | ||||||||||
| Christopher C. Cambria joined Mercury in 2016 as Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary and was appointed Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary in 2017. Prior to joining Mercury, he was Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary of Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. from 2012 to 2016 and Vice President, General Counsel from 2011 to 2012. He was with L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. from 1997 through 2009 serving as Senior Vice President and Senior Counsel, Mergers and Acquisitions from 2006 to 2009, Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel from 2001 to 2006, and Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from 1997 to 2001. Prior to L-3, Mr. Cambria was an Associate with Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson and Cravath, Swaine & Moore. | |||||||||||
 | Thomas Huber | ||||||||||
| Thomas Huber joined Mercury in September 2021 as Executive Vice President, Chief Transformation Officer. Prior to joining Mercury, Mr. Huber was a Managing Director and Partner at the Boston Consulting Group from 2019 to September 2021, serving as a core member of their transformation and operations practice areas. Mr. Huber was a Managing Director and Partner at Bain & Company, working with clients in strategy, operations, and M&A from 2010 to 2018. | |||||||||||
38
 | Brian E. Perry | ||||||||||
| Brian E. Perry joined Mercury in 2008 and has served as our Executive Vice President, President, Processing division since August 2021. He served as Senior Vice President of our Processing division starting in July 2020. Prior to that, he was President of our Mercury Defense Systems business unit starting in 2014 and Vice President and General Manager of our Services and Systems Integration group from 2011 to 2014. Prior to joining Mercury, Mr. Perry was the General Manager for Suntron Corporation’s Northeast Express and served in various roles with Lockheed Martin and General Electric Aircraft Engines. | |||||||||||
 | Michael D. Ruppert | ||||||||||
| Michael D. Ruppert joined Mercury in 2014 as Senior Vice President, Strategy and Corporate Development and in 2017 was named Executive Vice President, Strategy and Corporate Development. In 2018 Mr. Ruppert was appointed the Company’s Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Prior to joining Mercury, from 2013 to 2014, Mr. Ruppert was Co-Founder and Managing Partner of RS Partners, LLC, a boutique advisory firm focused on the aerospace & defense industries. Prior to that, he was a Managing Director at UBS Investment Bank where he led the defense investment banking practice from 2011 to 2013. Mr. Ruppert also held positions in the investment banking divisions at Lazard Freres & Co from 2008 to 2011 and at Lehman Brothers from 2000 to 2008. | |||||||||||
 | James M. Stevison | ||||||||||
| James M. Stevison joined Mercury in October 2021 as its Executive Vice President and Chief Growth Officer. Dr. Stevison brings to Mercury more than 16 years of global experience in the aerospace and defense industry. Prior to joining Mercury, he was Vice President of Strategy for Raytheon Missiles & Defense. In that role, he led comprehensive business strategy, portfolio shaping, and evaluating investment opportunities to further advance the Raytheon Missiles & Defense portfolio. He also served as Vice President of Strategic and Naval Systems at Raytheon Missiles Systems. Prior to that, he was the director of the SM-3® program, where he was responsible for all variants of the SM-3® missile portfolio, both domestically and internationally. Dr. Stevison has previously held senior leadership roles at Lockheed Martin and at Miltec Systems, a Ducommun Company. A U.S. Army veteran, Dr. Stevison retired from the Army in 2005, following an accomplished 20-year military career that included leadership roles with the Missile Defense Agency and the U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Command. | |||||||||||
 | Charles R. Wells, IV | ||||||||||
| Charles R. Wells, IV joined Mercury in November 2021 as its Executive Vice President and President of Mercury’s Microelectronics Division. Mr. Wells has more than 25 years’ experience across multiple disciplines including engineering, business development, program management, and executive management. Previously, he served as Vice President and General Manager for the Unmanned & Integrated Solutions Business Unit of Teledyne FLIR with full P&L responsibility while ensuring high levels of product quality and customer satisfaction. Earlier in his career, he worked as a Department of Defense civilian supporting the development and fielding of world-wide C4ISR networks and information systems. He also held positions in Northrop Grumman and ICX Technologies and served as a private consultant for large aerospace and defense companies. | |||||||||||
39
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes our executive compensation program for our 2022 fiscal year. This section details the compensation framework applied by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors (the "Committee") in determining the pay levels and programs available to our named executive officers for whom compensation is disclosed in the compensation tables included in the Tabular Executive Compensation Disclosure section of this proxy statement beginning on page 56. Our named executive officers for our 2022 fiscal year are:
| Name | Position | |||||||
| Mark Aslett | President and Chief Executive Officer | |||||||
| Michael D. Ruppert | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | |||||||
| Thomas Huber | Executive Vice President and Chief Transformation Officer | |||||||
| James M. Stevison | Executive Vice President and Chief Growth Officer | |||||||
| Charles R. Wells, IV | Executive Vice President and President of Microelectronics Division | |||||||
Our executive compensation programs are designed to attract and retain critical executive talent, to motivate behaviors that align with stockholders' interests and to link payouts with our performance. As described below:
•For fiscal 2022, target pay for our CEO individually, and for all of our named executive officers collectively, falls within a competitive range of 85% to 115% of peer median target pay levels.
•Our pay mix strongly supports the Company's pay-for-performance culture. For fiscal 2022, 87% of the Chief Executive Officer's target pay was in the form of variable pay that is subject to future performance.
•We delivered solid financial performance for fiscal 2022 despite a challenging business environment, resulting in our total shareholder return for fiscal 2022 approximating the 85th percentile of our peers.
•Payouts under our annual- and long-term compensation programs reflected our absolute and relative performance for periods ending in fiscal 2022. Our performance for fiscal 2022 was below our annual incentive plan targets, resulting in payouts at 89.59% of executives' target bonuses. Our overall three-year performance exceeded the 70th percentile of peer company achievements, resulting in performance stock award payouts at 199.9% of target.
•In February 2022, as part of a broad equity retention plan that covered our executives and over 100 additional leaders at our company, we accelerated the grant of long-term incentive awards that would have otherwise been made in August 2022 and granted additional special awards on a one-time basis to promote continuity of leadership, strategy and execution in connection with the reorganization of our operating structure against a backdrop of emerging industry and labor market challenges. These awards are a key element in our ongoing efforts to build on Mercury's strong foundation and drive the next phase of value creation at greater scale. The awards are intended to ensure that leaders across our organization remain focused on advancing our strategy, while at the same time supporting the retention of our key leaders at a critical junction in our transformation. Half of the long-term incentives granted to the named executive officers under this plan were in the form of performance stock awards, which are contingent upon future performance to have any realized value.
•For fiscal 2023, no additional long-term incentives have been, or are expected to be, granted to our named executive officers. In addition, the Committee determined to make no changes to the base salaries and target bonuses of our named executive officers. The Committee also adopted a new annual incentive plan design for fiscal 2023 that emphasizes an expanded set of performance measures that we believe to be further aligned with the creation of long-term shareholder value: adjusted EBITDA (weighted 50%), revenue (25%) and adjusted free cash flow (25%). The Committee intends to perform a similar review of our long-term incentive plan design for fiscal 2024, and to then review annual grants of long-term incentives for named executive officers during fiscal 2024 consistent with past practice.
Company Background
Mercury is a technology company that delivers commercial innovation to rapidly transform the global aerospace and defense industry. Our end-to-end processing platform enables a broad range of aerospace and defense programs, optimized for mission success in some of the most challenging and demanding environments. Processing technologies that comprise our platform
40
include signal solutions, display, software applications, networking, storage and secure processing. As a leading manufacturer of essential components, products, modules and subsystems, we sell to defense prime contractors, the U.S. government and original equipment manufacturers (OEM) commercial aerospace companies. Our products and solutions are deployed in more than 300 programs with over 25 different defense prime contractors and commercial aviation customers.
2022 Operating Environment and Performance Achievements
Operating Environment. For fiscal year 2022, we continued to encounter a challenging business environment. Our performance was primarily influenced by the following factors:
•U.S. Government spending for our products and services was adversely affected by an extended continuing resolution, which, while in effect, limited government funding to prior-year levels and delayed awards in respect of new government programs.
•Supply chain volatility — led by long lead times for high-end semiconductors and delayed supplier deliveries or "decommitments" — adversely affected the timing of our revenues and cash management.
•We experienced considerable price inflation in our costs for materials, which adversely affected our business.
•The challenging labor market led to unprecedented attrition and competition for top talent.
Performance Achievements. Despite the challenging industry, labor and economic environment, Mercury delivered solid financial performance for fiscal 2022, highlighted by the following items:
•Our fiscal 2022 revenues increased by 6.9% to $988.2 million, compared to $924.0 million for fiscal 2021. Our fiscal 2022 results included organic revenue of $870.4 million, a decrease of 5% from fiscal 2021.
•Our bookings increased by 21% from $881.2 million in fiscal 2021 to $1,063.1 million in fiscal 2022. Our book-to-bill ratio increased from 0.95x in fiscal 2021 to 1.08x in fiscal 2022.
•Our net income for fiscal 2022 was $11.3 million, compared to $62.0 million for fiscal 2021. Our adjusted EBITDA for fiscal 2022 was $200.5 million, remaining relatively flat compared to $201.9 million for fiscal 2021. The adjusted EBITDA results discussed in this paragraph are subject to the adjustments set forth in "Appendix B: Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures to GAAP Measures."
•We completed the acquisitions of Avalex and Atlanta Micro, which expanded our content and capabilities in both open mission systems and trusted microelectronics.
•Our total shareholder return ("TSR") for fiscal 2022 approximated the 85th percentile of the peer group used to measure our relative performance under long-term incentives awarded in fiscal 2022.
Compensation Philosophy, 2022 Target Pay and 2022 Incentive Plan Payouts
Compensation Philosophy. Our compensation philosophy is designed to promote a pay-for-performance culture. We consider market median compensation levels as our reference point in making executive pay decisions, subject to adjustments based on experience, performance, the other individual factors as described in "– Use of Market Data and Competitive Compensation Positioning" beginning on page 45 and as otherwise appropriate. The majority of each executive's target pay is in the form of incentive compensation that is subject to future performance to have any realized value. See the information in "– Mix of Pay" on page 45.
2022 Target Pay. The table below details each named executive officer's annual base salary, target annual incentive opportunity ("target bonus") and grant date target value of annual long-term incentive awards (collectively, "target pay") established by the Committee (and in the case of our Chief Executive Officer, ratified by our Board) for fiscal 2022.
41
| Salary | Target Bonus as % of Salary | Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards (1) | Target Pay | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Mark Aslett | 800,060 | 150% | 4,300,000 | 6,300,150 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Michael D. Ruppert | 446,351 | 110% | 1,430,000 | 2,367,337 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Thomas Huber | 425,000 | 100% | 830,000 | 1,680,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| James M. Stevison | 425,000 | 100% | 796,000 | 1,646,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Charles R. Wells, IV | 415,000 | 100% | 830,000 | 1,660,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
(1) The table above is intended to reflect each executive's ordinary compensation for fiscal 2022, and accordingly excludes the value of special long-term incentive ("LTI") awards granted to the named executive officers in February 2022 under an equity retention plan approved by our Board of Directors. In addition, the table excludes the value of "new-hire" awards granted to Messrs. Huber, Stevison and Wells in connection with their commencement of employment during fiscal 2022 because these awards were intended, in part, to restore compensation forfeited with a prior employer as an incentive to join our company. In lieu of these new-hire awards, the table includes the value established by the Committee for each such executive in fiscal 2022 as the basis for future annual LTI awards. For a further discussion of the special awards discussed in this paragraph, see "— Equity Retention Plan Awards" beginning on page 51 and "— Offer Letters with Named Executive Officers" beginning on page 51.
For fiscal 2022, target pay for our CEO individually, and for all of our named executive officers collectively, falls within a competitive range of 85% to 115% of peer median target pay levels. For a further discussion, see "– Use of Market Data and Competitive Compensation Positioning" beginning on page 45.
2022 Incentive Plan Payouts. Payouts under our annual incentive plan and our long-term incentive plan performance awards are subject to the achievement of pre-established targets.
With respect to our annual incentive plan, our financial performance achievements for fiscal 2022 were above threshold requirements but below our plan targets, which are based on adjusted EBITDA. Accordingly, aggregate plan payouts to our named executive officers for fiscal 2022 represented 89.59% of their respective target bonuses. For a further discussion, see "– Elements of 2022 Target Pay – Annual Incentives" beginning on page 48.
For our long-term performance awards whose performance periods end with fiscal 2022, our performance relative to our peers approximated the 57th percentile for adjusted EBITDA margin and the 86th percentile for revenue growth, resulting in performance stock award payouts at 199.9% of target. For a further discussion, see "– Payout of Performance Stock Awards for the 2020-2022 Award Cycle" on page 52.
Special LTI Awards Granted Under Equity Retention Plan
On February 7, 2022, our Board of Directors approved an equity retention plan (the "ERP") for our executives and over 100 additional leaders whose continuing efforts were determined to be critical to our success, including our named executive officers. The Board approved the ERP to promote continuity of leadership, strategy and execution in connection with the reorganization of our operating structure. The ERP is a key element in our ongoing efforts to build on Mercury's strong foundation and drive the next phase of value creation at greater scale. The ERP is intended to ensure that leaders across our organization remain focused on advancing our strategy, while at the same time supporting the retention of our key leaders at a critical junction in our transformation.
Under the ERP, all participants, including our named executive officers, were granted their annual equity awards for fiscal 2023 on February 15, 2022, in lieu of the grants that they would have otherwise received in August 2022. Additional one-time awards were granted under the ERP to support retention and further motivate achievement of our long-term, strategic goals in light of the macroeconomic conditions underlying the adoption of the ERP. The value of these additional retention grants varies among different ERP participants, and ranges from 1x to 2x of each participant's annual long-term incentive compensation. For a further discussion, see "— Equity Retention Plan Awards" beginning on page 51.
Consistent with annual our long-term incentive award mix, half of the long-term incentives granted to the named executive officers were in the form of performance stock awards, which are contingent upon future performance to have any realized value, and half were granted in the form of restricted stock awards. No additional long-term incentive awards will be issued to the named executive officers in fiscal 2023.
42
2023 Target Pay
For fiscal 2023, the Committee determined to make no changes to the base salaries and target bonuses of our named executive officers, nor did it grant them any long-term incentives beyond those previously granted for fiscal 2023 as part of the ERP. To further align our annual incentive program with our long-term growth strategy, the Committee adopted a new annual incentive plan design for fiscal 2023 that emphasizes an expanded set of performance measures tied to the creation of long-term shareholder value: adjusted EBITDA (weighted 50%), revenue (25%) and adjusted free cash flow (25%). The Committee intends to perform a similar review of our long-term incentive plan design for fiscal 2024, and to then review annual grants of long-term incentives for named executive officers during fiscal 2024 consistent with past practice.
SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND 2021 ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ("SAY-ON-PAY")
As part of our ongoing Board-led shareholder engagement program, we requested and/or had dialogues with a cross section of shareholders representing approximately 74% of our outstanding shares since our 2021 annual shareholders meeting. Our regular discussions with shareholders, proxy advisory firms and other stakeholders enable our Board to consider a broad range of viewpoints in boardroom discussions, including with respect to executive compensation. In particular, our new annual incentive plan design for fiscal 2023 incorporates feedback provided by shareholders over the past year, and has been well received by shareholders in our ongoing engagement discussions.
At our 2021 annual shareholders meeting, approximately 98.5% of the votes cast on our Say-On-Pay proposal were voted in favor of the compensation paid to our named executive officers for fiscal 2021. We believe that this strong level of shareholder support demonstrates, among other things, that our executive compensation philosophy, designs and determinations are well aligned with shareholder interests. The Committee considers the outcome of Say-On-Pay votes and other shareholder input in making decisions regarding the executive compensation program.
SOUND PAY PRACTICES
The Committee believes that Mercury's executive compensation program reinforces our pay-for-performance culture and includes corporate governance practices that are considered by investors to reflect market "best practices." The table below highlights key features of our executive compensation program.
Executive Compensation Program Features | |||||
Executive Compensation Program Includes | •Emphasis on long-term, performance-based compensation and meaningful stock ownership guidelines to align executive and shareholder interests •Transparent, formulaic incentive plans designed to promote short- and long-term business success •Clawback policy that applies to all incentive compensation, including stock-based awards •Limited perquisites consistent with competitive practices •Double trigger provisions for accelerated equity vesting and cash severance payable in connection with a change in control •Periodic compensation risk assessments to ensure program does not encourage excessive risk-taking | ||||
Executive Compensation Program Does not Include or Prohibits | •Excise tax gross-ups on severance/change in control payments •Repricing of stock options or other stock-based awards without shareholder approval •Excessive severance or change in control provisions •Hedging or pledging of company stock by executives, employees and non-employee directors | ||||
43
PROGRAM OVERVIEW
The table below outlines the principal elements of our executive compensation program. Detailed descriptions of each element of compensation and discussion of how the Committee determined compensation levels for fiscal 2022 can be found in the section "— Elements of Fiscal 2022 Target Pay" beginning of page 47.
| Compensation Program Design | |||||||||||||||||
Compensation Plan | Annual Pay Element | Performance Period | Performance Measures | Payout Range (vs. Target) | Fiscal 2022 Highlights | ||||||||||||
| — | Base Salary | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Annual Incentive Plan | Cash Bonus | Semi-Annual | Adjusted EBITDA | 0% to 150% | •Maximum bonus opportunity reduced to 100% of target to reflect increased volatility of potential performance results in light of the challenging industry, labor and economic environment | ||||||||||||
Long-Term Incentive Plan | Restricted Stock Awards (50%) | Three Years with Annual Vesting | — | — | •Equity retention plan awards granted in February 2022 to mitigate challenging industry and labor market environment | ||||||||||||
| Performance Stock Awards (50%) | Three Years | Relative EBITDA Margin (50%) | 0% to 300% | ||||||||||||||
Relative Revenue Growth (50%) | |||||||||||||||||
DETERMINING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Role of the Compensation Committee
Our executive compensation program is administered by the Committee. The Committee is primarily responsible for the review and approval of compensation for all of our executive officers. Compensation for our Chief Executive Officer is further subject to ratification by a majority of the independent directors on the Board. For a further discussion of the Committee's key areas of responsibility, see "Corporate Governance — What committees has the Board established? — Human Capital and Compensation Committee" beginning on page 19.
Role of Management and the Chief Executive Officer
Our human resources, finance and legal departments assist the Committee in the design and development of competitive compensation programs by providing data and analyses to the Committee and Mercer, the Committee's independent compensation consultant, in order to ensure that our programs and incentives align with and support our business strategy. Management also recommends incentive plan metrics, performance targets and other plan objectives to be achieved, based on expected Company performance and subject to Committee approval.
In connection with setting compensation for fiscal 2022, the Chief Executive Officer reviewed the performance of the other executive officers of the Company and submitted recommendations to the Committee for proposed base salary adjustments, target bonuses and grant date target values for annual long-term incentive awards. The Chief Executive Officer had no role in determining his own compensation. Except as described above, no other executive officer participated in the setting of his or her own compensation or the compensation of any other executive officer.
44
Role of the Compensation Consultant
The Committee has the sole authority to select, retain, terminate and approve the fees payable to outside consultants to provide it with advice on various aspects of executive compensation design and delivery. The Committee has retained Mercer to advise the Committee on executive and non-employee director compensation generally. In the course of conducting its activities for the Committee during fiscal 2022, representatives of Mercer attended meetings of the Committee and presented findings and recommendations to the Committee for discussion. Representatives of Mercer also met with management to obtain and validate data and review materials. The Committee's expenditures for Mercer were $451,839 for fiscal 2022.
In addition to its work for the Committee, Mercer may assist management in analyzing the compensation of our non-executive employees or by providing other services that are unrelated to the work performed by Mercer for the Committee. Our human resources department incurred $139,674 in fiscal 2022 with Mercer to provide the services of a chief medical advisor for COVID-related planning, due diligence services for M&A pursuits and support on long-term incentive valuations.
In April of 2022, the Committee evaluated whether any work performed by Mercer raised any conflict of interest and determined that it did not.
MIX OF PAY
The Committee believes that Mercury's pay mix strongly supports the Company's pay-for-performance culture. For fiscal 2022, 87% of the Chief Executive Officer's target pay was in the form of variable pay that subject to future performance. Base salary is the only element of target pay that does not fluctuate based on future performance. As illustrated below, the mix of incentive compensation for our named executive officers is balanced to avoid the risk of emphasizing short-term gains at the expense of long-term performance. The emphasis on long-term incentives demonstrates our strong commitment to the alignment of management and shareholder interests over time.
* For a further discussion of the amounts underlying our named executive officers' target pay for fiscal year 2022, see "Executive Summary — Compensation Philosophy, 2022 Target Pay and 2022 Incentive Plan Payouts — 2022 Target Pay" beginning on page 41.
USE OF MARKET DATA AND COMPETITIVE COMPENSATION POSITIONING
Compensation Peer Groups
The Committee believes that Mercury's success is dependent upon its ability to continue to attract and retain high-performing executives. To ensure the comparability of our executive compensation practices and pay levels, the Committee has historically monitored executive pay at selected technology, aerospace and defense, and other industrial companies ("peers") with whom Mercury competes for business, executive talent or investor capital. The Committee evaluates each peer on an annual basis to determine its continued suitability from a pay benchmarking perspective. The selection criteria examined include:
•Operational Fit: companies in the same or similar industries with a comparable business model, mix and client base.
45
•Financial Scope: companies of similar size as measured by annual corporate revenues. In connection with the benchmarking of target pay in fiscal 2022, the Company approved the use of two compensation peer groups differentiated by financial scope.
◦The "Primary Peer Group" consists of peers that generally fall within a range of one-half to two times the size of Mercury (targeted at approximately $1 billion in annual revenues).
◦The "Reference Peer Group" consists of peers that generally fall within a range of one-half to two times of a target value that is double the size of Mercury (targeted at approximately $2 billion in annual revenues).
The primary peer group is used as the principal group of peer companies used to benchmark executive pay levels and practices, and to assess Mercury's relative performance achievements under long-term incentive awards. The reference peer group is used as a supplemental reference in considering appropriate pay levels in light of Mercury's strong historical rate of growth and the need for Mercury to attract top talent suitable for Mercury's next stage of growth. As noted in "— Competitive Market Positioning" on page 47, the fiscal 2022 target pay of our Chief Executive Officer individually, and of all of our named executive officers collectively, fell within a competitive range of median with respect to both peer groups.
The table below shows the composition of our primary peer group that was established by the Committee in January 2021 for use in benchmarking target pay levels at the end of fiscal 2021 and in connection with making target pay decisions for fiscal 2022.
| Primary Peer Group for Fiscal 2022 | ||||||||
| Astronics Corporation | FLIR Systems, Inc. | MKS Instruments, Inc. | ||||||
| Belden Inc. | HEICO Corporation | NETGEAR, Inc. | ||||||
| Brooks Automation, Inc. | II-VI Incorporated | NetScout Systems, Inc. | ||||||
| Cognex Corporation | Infinera Corporation | Novanta Inc. | ||||||
| Comtech Telecommunications Corp. | iRobot Corporation | OSI Systems, Inc. | ||||||
| Diodes Incorporated | Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. | Ribbon Communications Inc. | ||||||
| Ducommun Incorporated | Methode Electronics, Inc. | Rogers Corporation | ||||||
As compared to the primary peer group used to benchmark target pay for fiscal 2021, the Committee replaced three companies in the group (removing ADTRAN, Inc., CTS Corp., and M/A-COM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc., and adding Belden Inc., FLIR Systems, Inc., and HEICO Corporation) to reflect the increased target size of the group (consistent with Mercury's expected revenues for fiscal 2022) from $750 million to $1 billion.
The table below shows the composition of our reference peer group that was established by the Committee in January 2021 for use as a supplemental reference in considering appropriate pay levels at the end of fiscal 2021, and in connection with making target pay decisions for fiscal 2022.
| Reference Peer Group for Fiscal 2022 | ||||||||
| Belden Inc. | Infinera Corporation | OSI Systems, Inc. | ||||||
| Curtis-Wright Corporation | Keysight Technologies, Inc. | Rogers Corporation | ||||||
| Diodes Incorporated | Maxar Technologies Inc. | Teledyne Technologies Incorporated | ||||||
| FLIR Systems, Inc. | Methode Electronics, Inc. | Teradyne, Inc. | ||||||
| HEICO Corporation | MKS Instruments, Inc. | TTM Technologies, Inc. | ||||||
| Hexcel Corporation | Moog Inc. | Viasat, Inc. | ||||||
| II-VI Incorporated | NetScout Systems, Inc. | |||||||
As compared to the reference peer group used to benchmark target pay for fiscal 2021, the Committee replaced four companies from the group (removing Astronics Corporation, AVX Corporation, Cognex Corporation and Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc., and adding Keysight Technologies, Inc., Maxar Technologies Inc., TTM Technologies, Inc. and Viasat, Inc.) to reflect the increased target size of the group (consistent with an amount that is double Mercury's expected revenues for fiscal 2022) from $1.5 billion to $2 billion, and the acquisition of AVX Corporation by Kyocera Corp. in March 2020.
46
The Committee subsequently met in January 2022 to consider whether any changes should be made to the above compensation peer groups in connection with benchmarking target pay levels at the end of fiscal 2022, and in connection with making target pay decisions for fiscal 2023. At that time, the Committee determined to remove Brooks Automation from the primary peer group and FLIR Systems from both peer groups because they had completed recent mergers and dispositions activities that rendered them no longer suitable for these groups.
Use of Market Data
In reviewing competitive compensation levels for fiscal 2022, the Committee considered compensation peer group data for all named executive officers other than Messrs. Huber and Stevison. The Committee did not utilize compensation peer group data for Messrs. Huber and Stevison (who served during fiscal 2022 as our Chief Transformation Officer and our Chief Growth Officer, respectively) due to the limited number of benchmarking matches for their positions within the compensation peer groups. Instead, the Committee used survey data from the Radford Global Technology Survey (the "Survey Data") for this purpose. For Mr. Wells (who served as President of our Microelectronics division in fiscal 2022), the Committee considered competitive compensation levels based on the average of the compensation peer group data and the Survey Data because it believed that including a broader survey group more accurately reflects the labor market for division presidents and ensures a meaningful sample size given the revenues of the division led by Mr. Wells. The Survey Data utilized for Messrs. Huber, Stevison and Wells was size adjusted by Mercer to reflect the annual revenues of the Company and of our Microelectronics division, as applicable, and for the benchmarking conducted in June 2022, was aged to approximate that time.
Competitive Market Positioning
The Committee's practice is to make pay decisions regarding the elements of compensation that compose each named executive officer's target pay (base salary, target bonus and grant date target value of long-term incentives) in July of each fiscal year, in light of benchmarking data reviewed at the end of the prior fiscal year. As part of its decision-making process, the Committee compares each named executive officer's target pay for the fiscal year against the market median; however, the Committee does not use market data in isolation in determining pay. Instead, competitive market data serves as one of many considerations used by the Committee in determining base salary adjustments and target pay opportunities for both annual and long-term incentives. The primary factors considered by the Committee in making its annual pay determinations is shown below.
| Target Pay Determinants | ||||||||
•Positioning to competitive market median | •Long-term financial and individual performance | •Role and responsibilities relative to benchmark | ||||||
•Competitive mix of fixed and variable pay | •Tenure and experience in role | •Internal pay equity | ||||||
•Competitive mix of cash and equity | •Expected future contributions and market conditions | •Prior year’s compensation levels | ||||||
Based on the most recent benchmarking conducted by the Committee in June 2022, the fiscal 2022 target pay of our Chief Executive Officer individually, and of all of our named executive officers collectively, fell within a competitive range of 85% to 115% of market median, including as separately derived using primary peer group data and reference peer group data. For a further discussion of the amounts underlying our named executive officers' target pay for fiscal year 2022, see "Executive Summary — Compensation Philosophy, 2022 Target Pay and 2022 Incentive Plan Payouts — 2022 Target Pay" beginning on page 41.
ELEMENTS OF FISCAL 2022 TARGET PAY
Base Salary
Base salary serves as the foundation of an executive's compensation and is an important component in our ability to attract and retain executive talent. On an individual basis, the Committee considers each executive's role and responsibilities, experience, tenure, business results and individual performance, competitive market pay levels, and internal pay equity considerations in making base salary adjustments.
For fiscal 2022, the Committee approved (and in the case of Mr. Aslett, the Board ratified) base salary increases of 9.0% and 7.0% for Messrs. Aslett and Ruppert, respectively, primarily to maintain their positioning relative to market median levels. These base salary increases became effective as of the beginning of the second quarter of fiscal 2022.
47
The Committee approved new base salaries for Messrs. Huber, Stevison and Wells in connection with the commencement of their employment in fiscal 2022. For a further discussion, see "— Offer Letters with Named Executive Officers" beginning on page 51.
Fiscal 2022 Base Salary* | Fiscal 2021 Base Salary* | Percent Change | |||||||||
| Mark Aslett | 800,060 | 734,000 | 9.0 | % | |||||||
| Michael D. Ruppert | 446,351 | 417,150 | 7.0 | % | |||||||
| Thomas Huber | 425,000 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||
| James M. Stevison | 425,000 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||
| Charles R. Wells, IV | 415,000 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||
* Reflects annualized base salary rates in effect as of the beginning of the second quarter of the fiscal years indicated or, in the case of Messrs. Huber, Stevison and Wells, as of their respective dates of hire.
Annual Incentives
The annual incentive plan ("AIP") provides our executives with the opportunity to earn annual cash incentive awards based on their respective target bonuses and on company performance relative to pre-established goals.
| Key Features of the Annual Incentive Plan | ||
•Performance criteria defined at the beginning of each semi-annual performance period | ||
•Performance compared to pre-established goals for adjusted EBITDA that are aligned with our strategic operating plan | ||
•Payouts can range from 0% to 150% of target bonus based on performance | ||
•The Committee retains discretion to adjust payouts, including in the event that calculated results under the plan do not appropriately reflect our overall performance for the year | ||
Target Bonuses for Fiscal 2022
AIP target bonuses are established at the beginning of each fiscal year for each named executive officer as a percentage of their base salary. For fiscal 2022, the target bonus for each of Messrs. Aslett and Ruppert, as a percentage for their respective base salaries, was held constant at fiscal 2021 levels. The Committee approved new target bonus percentages for Messrs. Huber, Stevison and Wells in connection with the commencement of their employment in fiscal 2022. For a further discussion, see "— Offer Letters with Named Executive Officers" beginning on page 51.
Fiscal 2022 Base Salary* | Fiscal 2022 Target Bonus (%) | Fiscal 2022 Target Bonus ($) | |||||||||
| Mark Aslett | 800,060 | 150 | % | 1,200,090 | |||||||
| Michael D. Ruppert | 446,351 | 110 | % | 490,986 | |||||||
| Thomas Huber | 425,000 | 100 | % | 425,000 | |||||||
| James M. Stevison | 425,000 | 100 | % | 425,000 | |||||||
| Charles R. Wells, IV | 415,000 | 100 | % | 415,000 | |||||||
* Reflects annualized base salary rates in effect as of the beginning of the second quarter of the fiscal years indicated or, in the case of Messrs. Huber, Stevison and Wells, as of their respective dates of hire.
Performance Goals and Payout Ranges for Fiscal 2022
The Committee typically establishes threshold and target performance goals for adjusted EBITDA under the AIP at the beginning of the first half ("H1") and second half ("H2") of each fiscal year. Performance goals for H1 are set in July based on our annual strategic operating plan forecast (the "SOP"). At the same meeting, the Committee establishes payout weightings for H1 and H2 performance based on the allocation, under our SOP, of the expected adjusted EBITDA results for the fiscal year between the H1 and H2 performance periods.
Performance goals for H2 are set in January based on a mid-year update to the SOP. At the same meeting, the Committee establishes "over-achievement" performance goals for the full fiscal year that allow executives to receive supplemental payouts in the event that actual adjusted EBITDA for the fiscal year exceeds the combined targets for H1 and H2 performance. These
48
supplemental payouts are designed so that collectively with the H1 and H2 goals, each executive's payout opportunity for the fiscal year ranges from 0% to 150% of their target bonus.
For fiscal 2022, the Committee met in July 2021 and January 2022 and established threshold and target performance goals based on adjusted EBITDA forecasts under our SOP for H1 and H2 accordingly. In connection with approving the H2 performance goals, the Committee determined that each executive's aggregate payout opportunities under the AIP for 2022 should be limited to a maximum of 100% of their target bonus in light of the increased potential for volatility in light of the challenging industry, labor and economic environment. Accordingly, the Committee did not establish any "over-achievement" performance goals for the 2022 fiscal year.
The table below sets forth the specific performance goals and payout opportunities established by the Committee under the AIP for H1 and H2 of fiscal 2022, including the relative weightings of H1 and H2 in determining each executive's total bonus opportunities for the full fiscal year.
| First Half of Fiscal 2022 (38% of Fiscal 2022 Bonus Opportunity) | Second Half of Fiscal 2022 (62% of Fiscal 2022 Bonus Opportunity) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Performance Goal | Adjusted EBITDA Performance Result (in millions) | H1 Payout Percentage* | Adjusted EBITDA Performance Requirement (in millions) | H2 Payout Percentage* | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Target | At or above 85.5 | 100 | % | At or above 136.5 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Threshold | 51.3 | 60 | % | 81.9 | 60 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Below Threshold | Below 51.3 | — | % | Below 81.9 | — | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
* Payout percentages for performance results between Threshold and Target are calculated using linear interpolation.
Actual Results and AIP Payouts for Fiscal 2022
For purposes of calculating actual financial results under the AIP, the Committee excludes the effects of pre-established categories of items that it believes are not reflective of operating performance. These categories are identical to the adjustments that we use for the external reporting of our adjusted EBITDA results in our periodic earnings releases. For a further discussion of these adjustments, see "Appendix B: Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures to GAAP Measures."
In addition to these adjustments, the Committee's practice is to adjust AIP results to exclude the impact of acquisitions that were not included in the SOP forecast used to establish the performance requirements for the applicable performance period. In the first half of fiscal 2022, Mercury completed the acquisitions of Avalex and Atlanta Micro. These acquisitions, which contributed $1.6 million in the aggregate to our H1 adjusted EBITDA results, were not included in our SOP forecast used to set our H1 AIP performance goals. Accordingly, the Committee excluded these results from our H1 performance under the AIP. The expected impact of these acquisitions was included in our mid-year SOP update used to set our H2 AIP performance goals, and accordingly, the Committee included the actual contributions of these acquisitions in calculating our H2 performance results under the AIP.
After giving effect to these adjustments, our adjusted EBITDA performance under the AIP for fiscal 2022 was $74.9 million for H1 and $124.1 million for H2. Accordingly, the payout percentages earned by our executives under the AIP for 2022 were 87.41% for H1, 90.92% for H2 and 89.59% for fiscal year 2022 on a weighted average basis, as set forth in further detail below.
| AIP Payouts for H1 | AIP Payouts for H2 | AIP Payouts for FY22 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Name | Target Bonus | Weighting | Payout Percentage | Payout* | Weighting | Payout Percentage | Payout* | Weighted Payout Percentage | Payout | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Mark Aslett | 1,200,090 | 38.00 | % | 87.41 | % | 398,619 | 62.00 | % | 90.92 | % | 676,496 | 89.59 | % | 1,075,115 | |||||||||||||||
| Michael D. Ruppert | 490,986 | 38.00 | % | 87.41 | % | 163,085 | 62.00 | % | 90.92 | % | 276,770 | 89.59 | % | 439,855 | |||||||||||||||
| Thomas Huber | 425,000 | 38.00 | % | 87.41 | % | 141,167 | 62.00 | % | 90.92 | % | 239,574 | 89.59 | % | 380,741 | |||||||||||||||
| James M. Stevison | 425,000 | 38.00 | % | 87.41 | % | 141,167 | 62.00 | % | 90.92 | % | 239,574 | 89.59 | % | 380,741 | |||||||||||||||
| Charles R. Wells, IV | 415,000 | 38.00 | % | 87.41 | % | 137,846 | 62.00 | % | 90.92 | % | 233,937 | 89.59 | % | 371,783 | |||||||||||||||
* Individual payouts for H1 and H2 performance were delivered to the named executive officers on February 17, 2022 and August 18, 2022, respectively.
49
Long-Term Incentives
Long-term incentives are intended to align the interests of the named executive officers with shareholders by linking a meaningful portion of executive pay to shareholder value creation over a multi-year period. Long-term incentives are also provided to drive the performance of our long-term business strategy, engage and retain our key executives and facilitate ownership of our common stock. For fiscal 2022, the Committee approved the grant of long-term incentives to our named executive officers in the form of restricted stock awards ("RSAs") and performance stock awards ("PSAs").
Restricted Stock Awards
RSAs are awarded to named executive officers under our long-term incentive program to facilitate executive ownership of company stock, to align the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders and to support retention. RSAs vest in equal annual increments over a three-year period, and the ultimate value of these awards to recipients is dependent on our stock price at the time of vesting.
Performance Stock Awards
PSAs are awarded to named executive officers under our long-term incentive program primarily to motivate multi-year financial achievements that are aligned with shareholder value creation. The performance requirements of the PSAs awarded by the Committee for fiscal 2022 are substantially identical to those awarded by the Committee for fiscal 2021. The requirements are equally weighted between goals for revenue growth and Adjusted EBITDA Margin performance, for the three-year fiscal period ending with fiscal 2024, relative to the achievements over this period of our primary peer group for fiscal 2022. For the list of companies that comprise our primary peer group for fiscal 2022, see "Use of Market Data and Competitive Compensation Positioning — Compensation Peer Groups" beginning on page 45. The number of shares ultimately earned under the PSAs will range from 0% to 300% of the target number of shares awarded at the time of grant, based on our actual performance achievements over the three-year performance period, as further described in the table below.
| PSA Performance Goal | Performance Achievement Relative to Peer Group | Payout Percentage* | ||||||||||||
| Maximum | At or above 90th percentile | 300 | % | |||||||||||
| 75th percentile | 200 | % | ||||||||||||
| Target | 50th percentile | 100 | % | |||||||||||
| Threshold | At or below 25th percentile | — | % | |||||||||||
* Payout percentages for achievements between Threshold and Maximum are calculated using linear interpolation.
For PSA awards granted in fiscal 2022, "Adjusted EBITDA Margin" means adjusted EBITDA divided by revenue. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure that excludes the effects of pre-established categories of items that the Committee believes are not reflective of operating performance. These categories are identical to the adjustments that we use for the external reporting of our adjusted EBITDA results in our periodic earnings releases, other than adjustments for stock-based and other non-cash compensation expense. For a further discussion of these adjustments, see "Appendix B: Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures to GAAP Measures."
While the Committee has elected to use adjusted EBITDA as a factor in determining performance under both our annual incentive awards and our PSAs, the performance requirements under these awards are designed so that resulting payouts reflect different and important aspects of company performance that are not duplicative. Payouts under the annual incentive plan are based on performance for a single fiscal year, while payouts under the PSAs require sustained performance achievements, relative to the primary peer group, over a three-year fiscal period. The Committee believes it is appropriate to separately reward annual and long-term adjusted EBITDA performance achievements because of the importance of earnings in creating long-term shareholder value.
Annual Long-Term Incentive Awards Granted in Fiscal 2022
The Committee typically approves long-term incentive awards for named executive officers on an annual basis in July of each fiscal year, to be granted in mid-August. For fiscal 2022, the Committee approved (and in the case of Mr. Aslett, the Board ratified) the following grants of long-term incentive awards to Messrs. Aslett and Ruppert, which were granted on August 16, 2021.
50
| Grant Date Target Value of Long-Term Incentives for Fiscal Year 2022 | |||||||||||
Restricted Stock Awards* ($) | Performance Stock Awards* ($) | Total ($) | |||||||||
| Mark Aslett | 2,150,000 | 2,150,000 | 4,300,000 | ||||||||
| Michael D. Ruppert | 715,000 | 715,000 | 1,430,000 | ||||||||
* Grant date target values were converted into the number of shares underlying each award based on the average closing price of Mercury's common stock during the 30 calendar days prior to the grant date.
The Committee subsequently approved "new hire" long-term incentive awards for Messrs. Huber, Stevison and Wells in connection with their commencement of employment during fiscal 2022, and the Board later approved special long-term incentive awards for the named executive officers under an equity retention plan encompassing over 100 leaders whose continuing efforts are critical to our success. For a further discussion of these awards, see "— Offer Letters with Named Executive Officers" beginning on page 51 and "— Equity Retention Plan Awards" beginning on page 51.
OFFER LETTERS WITH NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
During fiscal 2022, the Committee approved the execution of offer letters with each of Messrs. Huber, Stevison and Wells that provided for the following initial terms of their employment as our Chief Transformation Officer, our Chief Growth Officer and President of our Microelectronics division, respectively:
•initial base salaries at the annual rates set forth in "— Elements of 2022 Target Pay — Base Salary" beginning on page 47;
•participation in our annual incentive plan for fiscal 2022 with a target bonus of 100% of their annualized base salary;
•in the case of Messrs. Huber and Stevison, individual sign-on bonuses of $300,000, which were paid to these executives in two installments during fiscal 2022 and are subject to repayment in full in the event of resignation or termination for cause on or prior to December 31, 2022; and
•the following grants of long-term incentive awards, which were intended in part to restore compensation forfeited with a prior employer, to motivate multi-year financial achievements that are aligned with shareholder value creation and to further align each executive's interests with those of our shareholders.
| Grant Date Target Value of "New Hire" Awards for Fiscal Year 2022 | |||||||||||
Restricted Stock Awards* ($) | Performance Stock Awards* ($) | Total ($) | |||||||||
| Thomas Huber | 1,500,000 | 500,000 | 2,000,000 | ||||||||
| James M. Stevison | 800,000 | 800,000 | 1,600,000 | ||||||||
| Charles R. Wells, IV | 800,000 | 800,000 | 1,600,000 | ||||||||
* Grant date target values were converted into the number of shares underlying each award based on the average closing price of Mercury's common stock during the 30 calendar days prior to the grant date.
The terms of the RSAs and PSAs granted to Messrs. Huber, Stevison and Wells pursuant to their offer letters are substantially identical to the terms of the annual awards granted to Messrs. Aslett and Ruppert on August 16, 2021 as part of their fiscal 2022 compensation. For a further discussion of the terms of these awards, see "— Elements of 2022 Target Pay — Long-Term Incentives" beginning on page 50.
EQUITY RETENTION PLAN AWARDS
At the start of fiscal 2022, we adopted a plan to reorganize Mercury's operating structure in order to manage the considerable growth we had achieved in recent years and to facilitate scaling our organization for future opportunities. In connection with this plan, we hired three new executives to lead in our new structure: Mr. Huber as our Chief Transformation Officer, Mr. Stevison as our Chief Growth Officer and Mr. Wells as President of our Microelectronics Division.
During this same period, substantial industry and labor market challenges began to emerge. The uncertainty associated with these trends was exacerbated by public shareholder activity. These conditions led to increased attrition within our enterprise, including with respect to one of the members of our executive leadership team, our Chief Human Resources Officer.
Following a detailed review of these circumstances, the Board determined that continuity of leadership, strategy and execution was in the best interests of our shareholders. Accordingly, on February 7, 2022, our Board approved an Equity Retention
51
Plan (the "ERP") encompassing our Chief Executive Officer, our executive leadership team and over 100 additional leaders whose continuing efforts were deemed critical to our success. The Board approved the ERP as a key element in our ongoing efforts to build on Mercury's strong foundation and drive the next phase of value creation at greater scale. The ERP was intended to ensure that leaders across our organization remain focused on advancing our strategy, while at the same time supporting the retention of our key leaders at a critical junction in our transformation.
Our Board approved the ERP at the recommendation of the Committee after consultation with its independent compensation consultant and careful consideration of a range of incentive options. Under the ERP, all participants, including our named executive officers, were granted their annual equity awards for fiscal 2023 on February 15, 2022, approximately six months earlier than our typical annual equity cycle. Additional one-time awards were granted under the ERP to retain and further incentivize achievement of our long-term strategic goals. The value of these additional retention grants varied among different ERP participants and ranged from 1x to 2x of each participant's annual long-term incentive compensation. In determining the value of the retention awards to be granted, the Committee considered broader market data for prior grants of similar awards by other public companies and share usage and dilution in respect of these awards. The value of each participant's individual retention grants reflects the significance of the participants' responsibilities, potential future contributions to the company's long-term success, their strategic importance to Mercury and their attractiveness to competitors.
Consistent with our long-term incentive program structure, half of the long-term incentives for the named executive officers under the ERP were granted in the form of performance stock awards that are contingent upon future performance to have any realized value, and half were granted in the form of restricted stock awards. The performance stock awards vest on the third anniversary following the date of grant, while the restricted stock awards vest in equal annual increments over the three-year period following the date of grant. No additional long-term incentive awards will be issued to the named executive officers in fiscal 2023.
Following the announcement and execution of the ERP, attrition among our key leaders has been significantly less than the population not receiving the award, and we have retained all members of our executive leadership team who participated in the ERP through the date of this proxy statement.
The table below sets forth, for each named executive officer, the portion of the grant date target value of the awards granted on February 15, 2022 that represent: (1) the accelerated grant of the executive's annual equity awards for fiscal 2023 and (2) the additional retention awards granted to the executive.
| Annual LTI Awards for Fiscal Year 2023 | One-Time Retention Awards | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Stock Awards* ($) | Restricted Stock Awards* ($) | Total ($) | Performance Stock Awards* ($) | Restricted Stock Awards* ($) | Total ($) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Mark Aslett | 2,150,000 | 2,150,000 | 4,300,000 | 4,150,000 | 4,150,000 | 8,300,000 | |||||||||||||||||
| Michael D. Ruppert | 715,000 | 715,000 | 1,430,000 | 1,215,000 | 1,215,000 | 2,430,000 | |||||||||||||||||
| Thomas Huber | 415,000 | 415,000 | 830,000 | 415,000 | 415,000 | 830,000 | |||||||||||||||||
| James M. Stevison | 398,000 | 398,000 | 796,000 | 398,000 | 398,000 | 796,000 | |||||||||||||||||
| Charles R. Wells, IV | 415,000 | 415,000 | 830,000 | 415,000 | 415,000 | 830,000 | |||||||||||||||||
* Grant date target values were converted into the number of shares underlying each award based on the average closing price of Mercury's common stock during the 30 calendar days prior to the grant date
The terms of all performance stock awards and restricted stock awards granted under the ERP to the named executive offers are substantially identical to the terms of the annual awards granted to executives generally on August 16, 2021 as part of their fiscal 2022 compensation, including performance periods and goals, and appropriate shareholder protections that limit termination-related vesting to death, disability and termination in connection with a change in control. For a further discussion of these awards generally, see "— Elements of Fiscal 2022 Target Pay — Long-Term Incentives" beginning on page 50. For a further discussion concerning the effect of a change in control or termination of employment on these awards, see "Tabular Executive Compensation Disclosure — Potential Payments Upon Change in Control or Termination of Employment" beginning on page 62.
PAYOUT OF PERFORMANCE STOCK AWARDS FOR THE 2020-2022 AWARD CYCLE
In August 2022, the Committee reviewed and certified the results for the performance stock awards granted to named executive officers in fiscal 2020. Payouts under these awards were contingent upon our adjusted EBITDA Margin and revenue growth achievements over the three-year performance period ending with fiscal 2022. Our performance relative to our peers approximated the 57th percentile for adjusted EBITDA margin and the 86th percentile for revenue growth, resulting in overall performance stock award payouts of 199.9% of the target number of shares originally awarded to each executive in fiscal 2020, subject to the executive's continued employment through August 15, 2022.
52
SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ACTIONS FOR FISCAL 2023
For fiscal 2023, the Committee determined to make no changes to the base salaries and target bonuses of any of our named executive officers. In addition, the Committee did not grant any long-term incentives to our named executive officers beyond those previously granted for fiscal 2023 in February 2022 as part of the equity retention plan. Finally, the Committee adopted a new annual incentive plan for fiscal 2023 under which performance-based payouts would be tied to our weighted achievements for the following financial measures: adjusted EBITDA (50%), revenue (25%) and adjusted free cash flow (25%). The Committee intends to perform a similar review of our long-term incentive plan design for fiscal 2024, and to then review annual grants of long-term incentives for named executive officers during fiscal 2024 consistent with past practice.
EXECUTIVE PERQUISITES
We provide our named executive officers with limited personal perquisites consistent with competitive practices. For fiscal 2022, these perquisites were limited to providing Messrs. Aslett and Ruppert with a $12,000 annual allowance for personal tax and financial planning.
EMPLOYMENT, SEVERANCE AND CHANGE IN CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS
We have entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Aslett, and severance agreements with each of our other executive officers, which provide specified benefits in connection with certain terminations of employment. Our severance benefits are designed to be market competitive and do not include tax gross-ups. Consistent with market practice, these arrangements provide enhanced benefits in the event of a termination in connection with a change in control, which are designed to ensure that our executives entertain proposals that are in the best interests of our shareholders even when it may not be in their own personal best interest, thereby aligning the interests of the executives with those of our shareholders. For a further description, see "Tabular Executive Compensation Disclosure — Potential Payments Upon Change in Control or Termination of Employment" beginning on page 62.
STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES
Our stock ownership guidelines reflect the Committee's belief that executives should accumulate a meaningful level of ownership in company stock to align their interests with those of our shareholders. The Chief Executive Officer's ownership guideline is equivalent in value to five times his base salary. The ownership guidelines for other executives who report directly to our Chief Executive Officer, including the other named executive officers, is equivalent in value to three times base salary. The Committee reviews progress toward guideline achievement annually. Each executive subject to stock ownership guidelines is required to retain 50% of net shares (after payment of fees, taxes and exercise prices, if applicable) acquired upon the vesting of stock awards or the exercise of stock options until the guideline multiple of base salary is met. For purposes of the guidelines, stock ownership includes shares of company stock held outright, share equivalents held in benefit plans and unvested RSAs and PSAs (assuming performance at target in the case of PSAs). As of July 1, 2022, all of our named executive officers were in compliance with our stock ownership guideline policy.
COMPENSATION CLAWBACK POLICY
Under our clawback policy, our Board will, in all appropriate circumstances, require reimbursement of any annual incentive payment or long-term incentive payment to an executive officer if:
•the payment was predicated upon the achievement of financial results that were subsequently the subject of a substantial restatement of our publicly filed financial statements;
•the Board determines that the executive engaged in intentional misconduct that substantially caused the need for the substantial restatement; and
•a smaller payment would have been made to the executive based upon the restated financial results
ANTI-HEDGING AND ANTI-PLEDGING POLICIES
Our policies prohibit the hedging or pledging of company stock by all executives, employees and non-employee directors.
COMPENSATION RISK ASSESSMENT
The Committee periodically reviews and discusses with management, management's assessment of whether risks arising from Mercury's compensation policies and practices for all employees, including executive officers, are reasonably likely to have a
53
material adverse effect on the company. As part of the most recent assessment, the following were determined on a collective basis for Mercury and its subsidiaries:
•Our compensation programs consist of both fixed and variable components, as well as short and long-term performance measures. Fixed compensation is in the form of base salary, which provides a steady income stream to our employees regardless of the performance of our business or stock price. Variable compensation (in the form of annual and long-term incentives) fluctuates based upon our performance against short- and long-term objectives or our stock price. This balanced mix of compensation is designed to motivate our employees, including our executive officers, to produce superior short- and long-term corporate performance without taking unnecessary or excessive risks.
•Our incentive compensation designs emphasize company profit as a key performance measure. We believe that our focus on profit encourages a comprehensive approach to our overall performance and emphasizes consistent behavior across the organization.
•Payouts under our annual incentive plan and our PSAs are subject to maximum limits as a percentage of target awards. We believe this mitigates excessive risk taking by limiting potential windfalls for dramatically exceeding performance expectations.
•We prohibit all of our employees from engaging in short sales or pledges of company stock, or buying or selling puts, calls, or other derivative securities related to company stock. These restrictions are intended to minimize the likelihood that our employees will become subject to personal incentives that are contrary to the long-term interests of Mercury and our shareholders.
•Our stock ownership guidelines policy is intended to align our executives' long-term interests with those of our shareholders and to encourage a long-term focus in managing the Company
TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted on December 22, 2017 modified Internal Revenue Code ("IRC") Section 162(m) and, among other things, limits the federal tax deduction for annual individual compensation to $1 million for named executive officers beginning with the 2018 tax year. Previously, compensation in excess of $1 million could be deducted if it was performance based. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act includes a transition relief rule in which these changes do not apply to compensation payable pursuant to a written binding contract in effect on November 2, 2017 and that is not materially modified after that date. To the extent it is applicable to our existing arrangements, the Committee may avail itself of this rule. The Committee considers the impact of tax laws when developing and implementing its executive compensation programs; however, the Committee expects to provide compensation that is not tax deductible when it believes that the value in doing so outweighs the value of the lost tax deduction.
EQUITY GRANT TIMING
We do not time the grant of equity awards to precede the release of non-public information. Grants of annual long-term incentive awards to executives and employees are typically made on or about the 15th day of each August. Grants of other equity awards (in connection with new hires, promotions and recognition awards), if any, are typically made on or about the 15th day of each month. Under the terms of the Company's long-term equity incentive plans, the exercise price of stock options awarded under such plans is equal to the fair market value of the underlying company stock on the date of grant. The Committee does not grant discounted stock options, and our long-term equity incentive plans do not permit stock option repricing without shareholder approval.
54
REPORT OF THE HUMAN CAPITAL AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Human Capital and Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy statement, and based on such review and discussion, the Committee recommended to Mercury's Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and be incorporated by reference into Mercury's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 1, 2022.
During fiscal 2022, Mary Louise Krakauer (Chair), Orlando P. Carvalho and Michael A. Daniels served as members of the Committee. Vincent Vitto served as a member of the Committee until October 27, 2021. Debora A. Plunkett has served as a member of the Committee since October 27, 2021, and each of Lisa S. Disbrow and Howard L. Lance has served as a member of the Committee since June 24, 2022. Barry R. Nearhos served as a member of the Committee until June 24, 2022.
By the Human Capital and Compensation Committee
of the Board of Directors of Mercury Systems, Inc.
Mary Louise Krakauer, Chair
Orlando P. Carvalho
Michael A. Daniels
Lisa S. Disbrow
Howard L. Lance
Debora A. Plunkett
55
TABULAR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DISCLOSURE
Summary Compensation Table
The following table provides summary information concerning compensation paid or accrued by us to or on behalf of our President and Chief Executive Officer; our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer; and each of our three other most highly compensated executive officers serving at our 2022 fiscal year end. These officers are collectively referred to as our "named executive officers."
| Name and Principal Position | Fiscal Year | Salary | Bonus(1) | Stock Awards(2)(3) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(4) | All Other Compensation(5) | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Mark Aslett President and Chief Executive Officer | 2022 | $ | 782,275 | $ | — | $ | 16,981,781 | $ | 1,075,115 | $ | 20,700 | $ | 18,859,871 | ||||||||||
| 2021 | 722,692 | — | 3,732,297 | 473,430 | 20,700 | 4,949,119 | |||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 672,077 | — | 3,819,504 | 1,032,187 | 20,550 | 5,544,318 | |||||||||||||||||
Michael D. Ruppert EVP, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | 2022 | 438,489 | — | 5,297,522 | 439,855 | 21,150 | 6,197,016 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 413,879 | — | 1,144,542 | 197,312 | 20,700 | 1,776,433 | |||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 399,696 | — | 1,255,026 | 443,005 | 20,550 | 2,118,277 | |||||||||||||||||
Thomas Huber(6) EVP and Chief Transformation Officer | 2022 | 333,461 | 300,000 | 3,807,386 | 380,741 | 9,139 | 4,830,727 | ||||||||||||||||
James M. Stevison(6) EVP and Chief Growth Officer | 2022 | 302,404 | 300,000 | 3,572,049 | 380,741 | 11,152 | 4,566,346 | ||||||||||||||||
Charles R. Wells, IV(6) EVP and President of Microelectronics Division | 2022 | 263,365 | — | 3,600,657 | 371,783 | 9,498 | 4,245,303 | ||||||||||||||||
(1)Represents sign-on bonuses that are subject to repayment in full in the event of resignation or termination for cause on or prior to December 31, 2022. For a further discussion, see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Offer Letters with Named Executive Offers" beginning on page 51.
(2)Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards granted to our named executive officers. The amounts reported in this column do not reflect whether the named executive officer has actually realized a financial benefit from the awards. The grant date fair value of stock awards is computed in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (ASC Topic 718). For a discussion of the assumptions and methodologies used to calculate the grant date fair value of stock awards in this proxy statement, please refer to Note B of the financial statements in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 1, 2022.
For fiscal 2022, the stock awards granted to the named executive officers fall within the following categories: (a) new-hire awards, (b) annual LTI awards for fiscal 2022, (c) accelerated grants of annual LTI awards for fiscal 2023, and (d) one-time retention awards granted under the equity retention plan. The table below provides the grant date fair value of the stock awards received by the named executive officers for each of these categories. For a further discussion, see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Offer Letters with Named Executive Offers" beginning on page 51, "Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Fiscal 2022 Target Pay — Long Term Incentives" beginning on page 50 and "Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Equity Retention Plan Awards" beginning on page 51.
| Name | New Hire Awards | Annual LTI Awards for Fiscal 2022 | Accelerated Grants of Annual LTI Awards for Fiscal 2023 | One-Time Retention Awards under the Equity Retention Plan | Total Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mark Aslett | $ | — | $ | 3,630,874 | $ | 4,556,277 | $ | 8,794,630 | $ | 16,981,781 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Michael D. Ruppert | — | 1,207,456 | 1,515,228 | 2,574,838 | 5,297,522 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Thomas Huber | 2,048,440 | — | 879,531 | 879,415 | 3,807,386 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| James M. Stevison | 1,885,134 | — | 843,516 | 843,399 | 3,572,049 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Charles R. Wells, IV | 1,841,711 | — | 879,531 | 879,415 | 3,600,657 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
56
(3)The amounts reported for PSAs in this column reflect the grant date fair value of such awards based upon the probable outcome of their performance conditions. For fiscal 2022, the values of the PSAs included for each named executive officer are: Mr. Aslett – $9,097,750; Mr. Ruppert – $2,834,673; Mr. Huber – $1,610,055; Mr. Stevison – $1,961,102 and Mr. Wells – $2,000,392. If these PSAs had been valued as of the grant date assuming that the highest level of performance would be achieved, the amounts included for each named executive officer would have been: Mr. Aslett – $23,652,093; Mr. Ruppert – $7,388,546; Mr. Huber – $3,900,017; Mr. Stevison – $4,702,570 and Mr. Wells – $4,800,795.
(4)Represents amounts earned under our annual incentive plan based on performance for the applicable fiscal year. For a further discussion, see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Fiscal 2022 Target Pay — Annual Incentives" beginning on page 48.
(5) The table below shows the components of this column for fiscal 2022:
| Name | Employer Contributions to 401(k) Plan(a) | Personal Tax and Financial Planning(b) | Total All Other Compensation | |||||||||||||||||
| Mark Aslett | $ | 8,700 | $ | 12,000 | $ | 20,700 | ||||||||||||||
| Michael D. Ruppert | 9,150 | 12,000 | 21,150 | |||||||||||||||||
| Thomas Huber | 9,139 | — | 9,139 | |||||||||||||||||
| James M. Stevison | 11,152 | — | 11,152 | |||||||||||||||||
| Charles R. Wells, IV | 9,498 | — | 9,498 | |||||||||||||||||
(a)Reflects company contributions credited to accounts of our named executive officers under the Mercury Employees Retirement Investment Trust, which is a tax-qualified, 401(k) defined contribution plan. Employer contributions vest in equal annual increments over the two-year period following the participant's date of hire.
(b)The amounts in this column represent an annual stipend paid in lump sum to secure personal tax and financial planning advisory services.
(6) Messrs. Huber, Stevison and Wells were not employed by Mercury prior to our 2022 fiscal year.
57
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table provides information regarding:(1) annual incentive plan awards and (2) PSAs and RSAs under the Mercury Systems, Inc. Amended and Restated 2018 Stock Incentive Plan. Plan-based awards granted to the named executive officers in fiscal year 2022 were approved by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors (the "Committee"), or by the independent members of our Board of Directors (in the case of all awards granted to our Chief Executive Officer, and awards granted to our other named executive officers on February 15, 2022), on the dates below.
| Name | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Approval Date | Grant Type | Grant Date | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mark Aslett | 7/28/21 | H1 AIP(1) | 273,621 | 456,034 | 456,034 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1/26/22 | H2 AIP(1) | 446,433 | 744,056 | 744,056 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7/27/21 | FY22 PSA(2)(3) | 8/16/21 | — | 34,993 | 104,979 | 1,815,437 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7/27/21 | FY22 RSA(2)(4) | 8/16/21 | 34,993 | 1,815,437 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/7/22 | FY23 PSA(3)(5) | 2/15/22 | — | 39,091 | 117,273 | 2,485,249 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/7/22 | FY23 RSA(4)(5) | 2/15/22 | 39,091 | 2,071,028 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/7/22 | Retention PSA(3)(6) | 2/15/22 | — | 75,454 | 226,362 | 4,797,064 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/7/22 | Retention RSA(4)(6) | 2/15/22 | 75,454 | 3,997,566 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Michael D. Ruppert | 7/27/21 | H1 AIP(1) | 111,945 | 186,575 | 186,575 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1/25/22 | H2 AIP(1) | 182,647 | 304,411 | 304,411 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7/27/21 | FY22 PSA(2)(3) | 8/16/21 | — | 11,637 | 34,911 | 603,728 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7/27/21 | FY22 RSA(2)(4) | 8/16/21 | 11,637 | 603,728 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/7/22 | FY23 PSA(3)(5) | 2/15/22 | — | 13,000 | 39,000 | 826,488 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/7/22 | FY23 RSA(4)(5) | 2/15/22 | 13,000 | 688,740 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/7/22 | Retention PSA(3)(6) | 2/15/22 | — | 22,091 | 66,273 | 1,404,457 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/7/22 | Retention RSA(4)(6) | 2/15/22 | 22,091 | 1,170,381 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Thomas Huber | 8/17/21 | H1 AIP(1) | 96,900 | 161,500 | 161,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1/25/22 | H2 AIP(1) | 158,100 | 263,500 | 263,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10/26/21 | New Hire PSA(3)(7) | 11/15/21 | — | 9,261 | 28,863 | 650,630 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8/17/21 | New Hire RSA(4)(7) | 9/15/21 | 30,236 | 1,397,810 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/7/22 | FY23 PSA(3)(5) | 2/15/22 | — | 7,546 | 22,638 | 479,744 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/7/22 | FY23 RSA(4)(5) | 2/15/22 | 7,546 | 399,787 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/7/22 | Retention PSA(3)(6) | 2/15/22 | — | 7,545 | 22,635 | 479,681 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2/7/22 | Retention RSA(4)(6) | 2/15/22 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||